BB
But this goes back to what I've been saying over the last couple of days - just because you don't have a camera on the ground doesn't mean the story isn't happening. It's exactly that kind of stupid, limited thinking that the news channels need to move on from.
I couldn't agree more that there's scope to take a step back from time to time to cover other stories - this is another failing of news channels in any breaking news situation, who rarely take time out of the major developing story to cover other news from elsewhere - but just because you don't have your own live footage doesn't mean there isn't anything to report on. Eyewitness reports, text reports and calls from correspondents on the ground, tweets from reliable sources, news from other news agencies, broadcasters and print journalists - there's lots of sources, with plenty of information coming through, and plenty still happening in numerous cities.
Ignoring or scaling back coverage of the live story due to the absence of live video, and replacing it with recorded packages, doesn't do justice to the developing nature of the story. There's still an awful lot going on - it's the responsibility of the presenters and producers to ensure that they keep communicating that effectively, even without live video to continuously visualise the story.
Perhaps though if the footage isn't there it's time to scale back the continuous live coverage and concentrate on reports and indeed other news.
But this goes back to what I've been saying over the last couple of days - just because you don't have a camera on the ground doesn't mean the story isn't happening. It's exactly that kind of stupid, limited thinking that the news channels need to move on from.
I couldn't agree more that there's scope to take a step back from time to time to cover other stories - this is another failing of news channels in any breaking news situation, who rarely take time out of the major developing story to cover other news from elsewhere - but just because you don't have your own live footage doesn't mean there isn't anything to report on. Eyewitness reports, text reports and calls from correspondents on the ground, tweets from reliable sources, news from other news agencies, broadcasters and print journalists - there's lots of sources, with plenty of information coming through, and plenty still happening in numerous cities.
Ignoring or scaling back coverage of the live story due to the absence of live video, and replacing it with recorded packages, doesn't do justice to the developing nature of the story. There's still an awful lot going on - it's the responsibility of the presenters and producers to ensure that they keep communicating that effectively, even without live video to continuously visualise the story.