AN
Regardless of your political persuasions, it is not the role of journalists to refer to a politician as misogynistic and homophobic, as was the case (I presume) referred to here - especially without giving them right to reply. Channel 4 are sailing very close to the wind these days.
BM
BM11
Regardless of your political persuasions, it is not the role of journalists to refer to a politician as misogynistic and homophobic, as was the case (I presume) referred to here - especially without giving them right to reply. Channel 4 are sailing very close to the wind these days.
With how Boris Johnson supporters like James Cleverly talk about Channel 4 I have a feeling privatisation is going to be soon back on the agenda.
BR
If they are misogynistic and homophobic it is absolutely right to call them out on it. The media has been pussy footing around bigots for far too long.
Regardless of your political persuasions, it is not the role of journalists to refer to a politician as misogynistic and homophobic.
If they are misogynistic and homophobic it is absolutely right to call them out on it. The media has been pussy footing around bigots for far too long.
WO
If they are misogynistic and homophobic it is absolutely right to call them out on it. The media has been pussy footing around bigots for far too long.
What happens if they're misandrist? Do we just turn a blind eye? Is that now acceptable?
Regardless of your political persuasions, it is not the role of journalists to refer to a politician as misogynistic and homophobic.
If they are misogynistic and homophobic it is absolutely right to call them out on it. The media has been pussy footing around bigots for far too long.
What happens if they're misandrist? Do we just turn a blind eye? Is that now acceptable?
WL
If they are misogynistic and homophobic it is absolutely right to call them out on it. The media has been pussy footing around bigots for far too long.
What happens if they're misandrist? Do we just turn a blind eye? Is that now acceptable?
Who suggested that?
Regardless of your political persuasions, it is not the role of journalists to refer to a politician as misogynistic and homophobic.
If they are misogynistic and homophobic it is absolutely right to call them out on it. The media has been pussy footing around bigots for far too long.
What happens if they're misandrist? Do we just turn a blind eye? Is that now acceptable?
Who suggested that?
DV
Kay Burley on Twitter in an exchange with Krishnan Guru-Murthy has indicated that Sky News' 'Debate' tomorrow will be Ad free.
AG
Note: @SkyNews won’t be taking any ad breaks during our #ToryLeadershipElection programme #battlefornumber10 #C4Debate
— Kay Burley (@KayBurley) June 16, 2019
MA
But the media have referred to Corbyn as anti-semtitic for years now but there has been no out cry?
Regardless of your political persuasions, it is not the role of journalists to refer to a politician as misogynistic and homophobic, as was the case (I presume) referred to here - especially without giving them right to reply. Channel 4 are sailing very close to the wind these days.
But the media have referred to Corbyn as anti-semtitic for years now but there has been no out cry?
AN
But the media have referred to Corbyn as anti-semtitic for years now but there has been no out cry?
Which journalists have specifically referred to him as anti-Semitic?
Regardless of your political persuasions, it is not the role of journalists to refer to a politician as misogynistic and homophobic, as was the case (I presume) referred to here - especially without giving them right to reply. Channel 4 are sailing very close to the wind these days.
But the media have referred to Corbyn as anti-semtitic for years now but there has been no out cry?
Which journalists have specifically referred to him as anti-Semitic?