UB
Given the fuss caused by Labour when Maggie was replaced, mid-term, by John Major, they'll find it difficult to replace Bliar with Brown, one month in, without having their previous words dragged up and calling another election.
... I thought he'd said he would already serve the full term anyway ...?
Nick Harvey posted:
Equidem posted:
Whatever happens, Blair will be gone within a month.
Given the fuss caused by Labour when Maggie was replaced, mid-term, by John Major, they'll find it difficult to replace Bliar with Brown, one month in, without having their previous words dragged up and calling another election.
... I thought he'd said he would already serve the full term anyway ...?
EQ
Given the fuss caused by Labour when Maggie was replaced, mid-term, by John Major, they'll find it difficult to replace Bliar with Brown, one month in, without having their previous words dragged up and calling another election.
... I thought he'd said he would already serve the full term anyway ...?
...He also said there were weapons of mass destruction which could be fired within 45 minutes....!
Uncle Bruce posted:
Nick Harvey posted:
Equidem posted:
Whatever happens, Blair will be gone within a month.
Given the fuss caused by Labour when Maggie was replaced, mid-term, by John Major, they'll find it difficult to replace Bliar with Brown, one month in, without having their previous words dragged up and calling another election.
... I thought he'd said he would already serve the full term anyway ...?
...He also said there were weapons of mass destruction which could be fired within 45 minutes....!
UB
Perhaps, Ed - but one was a statement based on intellegence, and the other was about going to war with Iraq. Whoops. Couldn't resist.