The Newsroom

Sky News Thread - Relaunch on Monday

Set and graphics revealed (January 2005)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
EY
the eye
From looking at Martins mock a page or two back, this is what I just came up with...

http://www.rp-networkservices.com/tvforum/uploads/skymock.jpg
MO
Moz
Urggghhhhh!
CA
cat
bbcworld2005 posted:
From looking at Martins mock a page or two back, this is what I just came up with...

http://www.rp-networkservices.com/tvforum/uploads/skymock.jpg


Erm, given you were the one who told him the previous versions were wrong, surely you must then know why they were wrong, and have a pretty good idea of what is actually going to be used?

To know the 3 weeks ago versions are out of date, presumably you've seen something more recent, so you wouldn't need to ''come up'' with anything or speculate as to what they might look like?

Baffling.
MD
mdtauk
Always second guess everything someone says on this forum.
EY
the eye
cat posted:
bbcworld2005 posted:
From looking at Martins mock a page or two back, this is what I just came up with...

http://www.rp-networkservices.com/tvforum/uploads/skymock.jpg


Erm, given you were the one who told him the previous versions were wrong, surely you must then know why they were wrong, and have a pretty good idea of what is actually going to be used?

To know the 3 weeks ago versions are out of date, presumably you've seen something more recent, so you wouldn't need to ''come up'' with anything or speculate as to what they might look like?

Baffling.


I have not had them showed to me, I have just had them described to me, but not in to much detail.
SE
Square Eyes Founding member
bbcworld2005 posted:
From looking at Martins mock a page or two back, this is what I just came up with...


cat posted:

Erm, given you were the one who told him the previous versions were wrong, surely you must then know why they were wrong, and have a pretty good idea of what is actually going to be used?

To know the 3 weeks ago versions are out of date, presumably you've seen something more recent, so you wouldn't need to ''come up'' with anything or speculate as to what they might look like?

Baffling.


I thought this bbcworld2005 numpty had already been exposed as knowing sod all about this relaunch, just posting rumour off another website.
EY
the eye
Square Eyes posted:
bbcworld2005 posted:
From looking at Martins mock a page or two back, this is what I just came up with...


cat posted:

Erm, given you were the one who told him the previous versions were wrong, surely you must then know why they were wrong, and have a pretty good idea of what is actually going to be used?

To know the 3 weeks ago versions are out of date, presumably you've seen something more recent, so you wouldn't need to ''come up'' with anything or speculate as to what they might look like?

Baffling.


I thought this bbcworld2005 numpty had already been exposed as knowing sod all about this relaunch, just posting rumour off another website.


Care to explain what the h*ll your on about?
SE
Square Eyes Founding member
http://www.tvforum.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=14033&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=660
MD
mdtauk
He believes you have been proven as knowing nothing about the relaunch and you shouldnt be believed.
EY
the eye
The employee who I know, hasnt even posted in that thread. I didn't even know him/her then.

Before that I was told things from what was an un-relaible source. I was then brushed up and been corrected.

and that thread was something totally different, and unrelated to what we are talking about now.
CA
cat
Numpty is an appropriate word.

I particularly liked this comments on the new music.

Given that the chances of him having heard it (aren't you in New Zealand, numpty?) are pretty damn slim, I find it amusing to hear it telling us how it will sound this, it will sound that.

Bugger off. You've contributed nothing worthwhile.
EY
the eye
Oh? Is that right? why don't you bugger off? huh??

Newer posts