This wallpaper was designed by Lee S for SkyNewsCentre.co.uk, Sky News have taken it from the site. With that said we'll probably not see it on Sky News anymore.
Tut Tut Tut! Sky News should know better than to take it off of the internet, no doubt without permission from Lee!
This wallpaper was designed by Lee S for SkyNewsCentre.co.uk, Sky News have taken it from the site. With that said we'll probably not see it on Sky News anymore.
Tut Tut Tut! Sky News should know better than to take it off of the internet, no doubt without permission from Lee!
Yes, the wallpaper that features the Sky News logo no doubt without permission.
I take it that nobody watched that politics and sex programme she was presenting on Monday?
THAT IS A DOWN RIGHT LIE - I watched it, and if thet is what Sky News are planning for a regular weekly documentary slot, I am looking forward to it. It had its chav moments, but the rest was cool.
Sheesh, don't give yourself an anurism.
I only asked since nobody has passed comment on the show, and people are usually pretty good at mentioning Sky News connected things in Sky News threads (like the Indy article) if they've come across them.
No need to be rude, thank you.
I suppose some people may of taken those capitals seriously, I didnt intend that, as I was watching SouthPark at the time, and was thinking of Cartman's voice at the time lol
Three of Sky News' best-known presenters - Kay Burley, Jeremy Thompson and Julie Etchingham - are to get their own shows when the network relaunches later this year.
The news broadcaster is planning to introduce more standalone programmes into its rolling news schedule as part of the relaunch, in an attempt to boost ratings.
Burley - who earlier this week presented Sky One documentary Sex, Lies and Politics, looking at four decades of political sex scandals - will host a news analysis programme on Sky News between midday and 2pm.
Thompson has landed a 90-minute slot from 5pm, in which he will present a roundup of the day's events, and Etchingham is to anchor a more in-depth daily look at news and current affairs between 7pm and 8pm.
The onscreen relaunch of Sky News programming will coincide with a move to a new studio complex at parent company BSkyB's HQ in Osterley, west London, and the recruitment of 30 extra staff.
The head of Sky News, Nick Pollard, described the changes as the "biggest step forward in Sky News' development since our launch 16 years ago".
"Twenty-four hour news provision has become increasingly competitive and the expansion will ensure that Sky News continues to lead the way in breaking news," he said.
Sky News is looking to recruit extra executive producers, producers, camera operators and editors as it staffs up for the relaunch.
Around 300 of the network's 502 worldwide staff will be moving to its new HQ, which already houses Five News, which Sky News began producing in January.
Mr Pollard has been briefing staff today about the planned changes.
Presumably this leaves 6.30 free, 8-9, 9-10, 10-11, 11-midnight.
Also leaves Sky News Today as a dead duck without Etchingham, so what Stanford's role will be should be interesting.
Will Etchingham continue to be one of the faces of five news? Helen Fospero has unofficially taken over some of Etchingham's presenting duties. Surely Etchingham can't do half an hour on five and then only have an hour to get ready for her own show.
Three of Sky News' best-known presenters - Kay Burley, Jeremy Thompson and Julie Etchingham - are to get their own shows when the network relaunches later this year.
The news broadcaster is planning to introduce more standalone programmes into its rolling news schedule as part of the relaunch, in an attempt to boost ratings.
Burley - who earlier this week presented Sky One documentary Sex, Lies and Politics, looking at four decades of political sex scandals - will host a news analysis programme on Sky News between midday and 2pm.
Thompson has landed a 90-minute slot from 5pm, in which he will present a roundup of the day's events, and Etchingham is to anchor a more in-depth daily look at news and current affairs between 7pm and 8pm.
The onscreen relaunch of Sky News programming will coincide with a move to a new studio complex at parent company BSkyB's HQ in Osterley, west London, and the recruitment of 30 extra staff.
The head of Sky News, Nick Pollard, described the changes as the "biggest step forward in Sky News' development since our launch 16 years ago".
"Twenty-four hour news provision has become increasingly competitive and the expansion will ensure that Sky News continues to lead the way in breaking news," he said.
Sky News is looking to recruit extra executive producers, producers, camera operators and editors as it staffs up for the relaunch.
Around 300 of the network's 502 worldwide staff will be moving to its new HQ, which already houses Five News, which Sky News began producing in January.
Mr Pollard has been briefing staff today about the planned changes.
Presumably this leaves 6.30 free, 8-9, 9-10, 10-11, 11-midnight.
Also leaves Sky News Today as a dead duck without Etchingham, so what Stanford's role will be should be interesting.
I wonder if any of those 30 jobs include IT staff - where do I apply?
I'm not sure about Sky News Today being a dead duck without Julie Etchingham, it's not as if the programme depends on her. IMHO it's just as good with fill-ins such as Sheila Jansen etc.
And also, do I take it Emma Crosby has been taken off Sunrise? I imagine she'll be getting more of a regular slot. I do find it strange, however, how some of Sky News' most famous presenters seem to just pop up in random places, like Viv Creegor, Lisa Aziz etc. The evening slot needs regular presenters instead of whoever seems to be hanging around at the time. Chris Roberts seems to be becoming a regular fixture, but I just can't warm to him, don't know why, I'm sure he's lovely really.
Also seems strange that JT will be doing 90 minutes, and Kay will have a shorter slot as well... will these be single-headed slots I wonder? I hope not, the channel borders on unwatchable when they do this at the moment. It will bugger up the schedule, having odd programmes here and there, what happens inbetween?
I personally think they should keep things similar to how they are. More obvious strands, maybe, but the current established partnerships like Kay and Mark, JT and Anna, seem to work well.
The idea is to have programmes in their own right, with rolling news in between. Not these pathetic strands they have at the moment, where the only difference in format is standing in different places and saying Sunrise instead of Sky News.
I wonder if they will use custom graphics for each programme.
