The Newsroom

Sky News: Presenters & Rotas

Chat about Sky News Presenters and Rotas Here (July 2010)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
TM
tmorgan96
This is TV Forum, not an inane rag like the Daily Mail.

Oh I wasn't aware this was such a high-class establishment, let me fetch my suit before I browse further...

... Rolling Eyes
PI
picard
This is TV Forum, not an inane rag like the Daily Mail.


http://tvnewsroom.site/sky-news/sky-news-anna-botting-maternity-leave-111313/

http://tvnewsroom.site/sky-news/skys-anna-botting-gives-birth-baby-boy-113407/
SL
Shaun Linden

But we all now know not to make any observations about Sky News presenters ever again.

Don't be needlessly passive-aggresive.

It depends on who it is, some people post their whole life on social media.

In a way, appearing on TV is another form/way of doing this, even if it's not intentional.

I guess we have to be PC these days, where we all behave like robots, never let out a smile or think for ourselves, through fear of offending someone. Any place I have worked, if someone was walking around with a bump, it was in the gossip. It's not like you can hide it. As long as it sticks to "is such and such pregnant" "yes or no" "that's good", it's not a bad thing. If it goes beyond that, then yes, maybe it's time to mind your own business.
.

The original post queried whether her putative maternity cover had been factored into the plans, right after I'd laid out for everybody how the slots would work.


That particular point-of-detail isn't even the business of anyone who isn't directly concerned with working on the 3-6:30 slot (myself included), so it isn't the business of anyone here.


Well that is not for you to decide whether it is our business or not. We can all ask, inquire, make comment and so on here freely and you could have simply stated that you don't comment and have no interest in whether a colleague rather than taking a holier than thou approach and dragging this whole thing out.
Bob, Luke and picard gave kudos
LL
London Lite Founding member
If Skygeek decides to leave after this discussion, I don't blame him for this thread turning into DS style nonsense.
PI
picard
If Skygeek decides to leave after this discussion, I don't blame him for this thread turning into DS style nonsense.


No need for that, DS is a whole other gutter level. One should expect to disagree and move on.
LU
Luke
If Skygeek decides to leave after this discussion, I don't blame him for this thread turning into DS style nonsense.

i'm not sure how the forum would survive not being told what to post.
the entire last two pages of pregnancy speculation came from him choosing to aggressively jump on a completely innocuous post which may well have been ignored - there's an obvious irony there
on the subject of Sarah Hughes, she seems to have come off quite unfortunate in this reshuffle - from a daily flagship show to Kay Burley's cover once a week. She's no worse than Sophy Ridge
tmorgan96, ginnyfan and Bob gave kudos
LL
London Lite Founding member
Luke posted:
If Skygeek decides to leave after this discussion, I don't blame him for this thread turning into DS style nonsense.

i'm not sure how the forum would survive not being told what to post.


It's not about being 'told' what to post, but to use your common sense. Skygeek has offered this forum plenty of information in the past, which is more useful to a TV presentation forum than speculation about if a presenter is pregnant and the apparent consequences to their job. It really doesn't make a difference to their pres if they're pregnant, have one arm, in a wheelchair or can hum the national anthem while tap dancing.

This is what makes us different from DS and other forums where speculation about presenters private lives is not relevant to the discussion of tv presentation.
AS
Asa Admin
Come on people, it's even written in the yellow box when you start a post "Posts should not relate to presenter's personal life/privacy". I appreciate it may have been a casual aside when posted but it's not difficult to stick to the rule and doesn't restrict other general discussion points about presenters that can be in this thread.

After four unnecessary pages, let's draw a line under it.
SN
The SNT Three
Luke posted:
If Skygeek decides to leave after this discussion, I don't blame him for this thread turning into DS style nonsense.

i'm not sure how the forum would survive not being told what to post.
the entire last two pages of pregnancy speculation came from him choosing to aggressively jump on a completely innocuous post which may well have been ignored - there's an obvious irony there
on the subject of Sarah Hughes, she seems to have come off quite unfortunate in this reshuffle - from a daily flagship show to Kay Burley's cover once a week. She's no worse than Sophy Ridge


Which is weird, I assume they will be tweaking the format to make the new show single anchored...
LJ
Live at five with Jeremy
Adam Boulton spoke about his new show today on the Media Show, looking forward to seeing this on air. Listen from 18:30...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b07vjx6l
:-(
A former member
The schedule s
Asa posted:
Come on people, it's even written in the yellow box when you start a post "Posts should not relate to presenter's personal life/privacy". I appreciate it may have been a casual aside when posted but it's not difficult to stick to the rule and doesn't restrict other general discussion points about presenters that can be in this thread.

After four unnecessary pages, let's draw a line under it.

Yes.

The only time it needs to be brought up is when said presenter says im off to have a baby etc which happen recently on stv edinburgh news and we have ended up with lucy covering.
:-(
A former member
Adam Boulton spoke about his new show today on the Media Show, looking forward to seeing this on air. Listen from 18:30...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b07vjx6l


I see dermont has promos for his new evening show.

Newer posts