TV
I have been told to keep it secret by a friend at sky. Trust me, it's hard not to tell you
AJ
You've been sworn to secrecy. And that's fine.
So don't bother alluding to it and posting self-indulgent "I know something you can't know" crap.
I have been told to keep it secret by a friend at sky. Trust me, it's hard not to tell you
You've been sworn to secrecy. And that's fine.
So don't bother alluding to it and posting self-indulgent "I know something you can't know" crap.
SK
Exciting and Glass Box? I think that´s a bit hard to believe isn´t it?
Keep an eye out on Monday for a very exciting new show from the glass box!
Exciting and Glass Box? I think that´s a bit hard to believe isn´t it?
MO
Exciting and Glass Box? I think that´s a bit hard to believe isn´t it?
That is so LOL and true. The box is boring. And the white graphics and repetitive theme..... makes the whole presentation dry and uninteresting to watch for extended periods. Sigh....
http://www.crn.com/ckfinder/userfiles/images/crn/images/whitebox400.jpg
Exciting and Glass Box? I think that´s a bit hard to believe isn´t it?
That is so LOL and true. The box is boring. And the white graphics and repetitive theme..... makes the whole presentation dry and uninteresting to watch for extended periods. Sigh....
http://www.crn.com/ckfinder/userfiles/images/crn/images/whitebox400.jpg
GM
Even skygeek gives us more than this, so whats the point in posting it if you won't even let on as to what is happening.
I have been told to keep it secret by a friend at sky. Trust me, it's hard not to tell you
Even skygeek gives us more than this, so whats the point in posting it if you won't even let on as to what is happening.
SK
I understand people's frustrations, but a balance has to be struck.
On the one hand, those of us who work in the industry like fostering people's enthusiasm. On the other, there are commercial sensitivities and contractual obligations that (quite rightly) mean we simply can't be specific about our employers' manoeuvres (no matter who we work for) until they're seen on-air.
It's not meant to be smug, and any evasiveness is out of necessity rather than spite. That's just the way it goes.
That said, I hope you'll like what you see.
ETA: Aside from one component, there's not going to be very much white!
On the one hand, those of us who work in the industry like fostering people's enthusiasm. On the other, there are commercial sensitivities and contractual obligations that (quite rightly) mean we simply can't be specific about our employers' manoeuvres (no matter who we work for) until they're seen on-air.
It's not meant to be smug, and any evasiveness is out of necessity rather than spite. That's just the way it goes.
That said, I hope you'll like what you see.
ETA: Aside from one component, there's not going to be very much white!
Last edited by Skygeek on 22 February 2017 12:06pm
TV
Well said
I understand people's frustrations, but a balance has to be struck.
On the one hand, those of us who work in the industry like fostering people's enthusiasm. On the other, there are commercial sensitivities and contractual obligations that (quite rightly) mean we simply can't be specific about our employers' manoeuvres (no matter who we work for) until they're seen on-air.
It's not meant to be smug, and any evasiveness is out of necessity rather than spite. That's just the way it goes.
That said, I hope you'll like what you see.
ETA: Aside from one component, there's no going to be very much white!
On the one hand, those of us who work in the industry like fostering people's enthusiasm. On the other, there are commercial sensitivities and contractual obligations that (quite rightly) mean we simply can't be specific about our employers' manoeuvres (no matter who we work for) until they're seen on-air.
It's not meant to be smug, and any evasiveness is out of necessity rather than spite. That's just the way it goes.
That said, I hope you'll like what you see.
ETA: Aside from one component, there's no going to be very much white!
Well said
GM
Well said
This is the sort of response that most people would be hoping for rather then a couple of words...
I understand people's frustrations, but a balance has to be struck.
On the one hand, those of us who work in the industry like fostering people's enthusiasm. On the other, there are commercial sensitivities and contractual obligations that (quite rightly) mean we simply can't be specific about our employers' manoeuvres (no matter who we work for) until they're seen on-air.
It's not meant to be smug, and any evasiveness is out of necessity rather than spite. That's just the way it goes.
That said, I hope you'll like what you see.
ETA: Aside from one component, there's no going to be very much white!
On the one hand, those of us who work in the industry like fostering people's enthusiasm. On the other, there are commercial sensitivities and contractual obligations that (quite rightly) mean we simply can't be specific about our employers' manoeuvres (no matter who we work for) until they're seen on-air.
It's not meant to be smug, and any evasiveness is out of necessity rather than spite. That's just the way it goes.
That said, I hope you'll like what you see.
ETA: Aside from one component, there's no going to be very much white!
Well said
This is the sort of response that most people would be hoping for rather then a couple of words...
SK
I wonder how this would be possible as they have to switch between SkyNewsCentre and the Glass Box then. That´s not possible with one presenter.
News @ 10??
I wonder how this would be possible as they have to switch between SkyNewsCentre and the Glass Box then. That´s not possible with one presenter.
LV
They said exciting new show. Surely can't be them trying (again) to make an appointment to view bulletin at 10pm, when ITV vacates on Monday. It didn't work (& wasn't exciting) in the 90s so surely not going to be something so retro.
News @ 10??
They said exciting new show. Surely can't be them trying (again) to make an appointment to view bulletin at 10pm, when ITV vacates on Monday. It didn't work (& wasn't exciting) in the 90s so surely not going to be something so retro.
SK
I wonder how this would be possible as they have to switch between SkyNewsCentre and the Glass Box then. That´s not possible with one presenter.
Oh, I think we'll manage!
News @ 10??
I wonder how this would be possible as they have to switch between SkyNewsCentre and the Glass Box then. That´s not possible with one presenter.
Oh, I think we'll manage!
SK
They said exciting new show. Surely can't be them trying (again) to make an appointment to view bulletin at 10pm, when ITV vacates on Monday. It didn't work (& wasn't exciting) in the 90s so surely not going to be something so retro.
You're forgetting one key factor: Reach then vs. now, plus one other ace we've got up our sleeve that I can't discuss right now but will become apparent by about 2220 on Monday.
News @ 10??
They said exciting new show. Surely can't be them trying (again) to make an appointment to view bulletin at 10pm, when ITV vacates on Monday. It didn't work (& wasn't exciting) in the 90s so surely not going to be something so retro.
You're forgetting one key factor: Reach then vs. now, plus one other ace we've got up our sleeve that I can't discuss right now but will become apparent by about 2220 on Monday.