The Newsroom

Sky News presentation - New studio onwards

(October 2016)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
NE
neonemesis
Calm down dude - I think it's fair to debate the basis of figures in this context. You have the privilege of a great deal of context and experience which others do not.
BA
bilky asko
Dave posted:
Dave posted:
I know its early so my maths may be way out... not had a cuppa tea yet too but...

3.5% of 7.5 billion = 262,500,000 people

http://www.skynewsinternational.com/advertise


Putting the best spin on data Sky News themselves only come up with 102 million people - about 1.4% of the worlds population.

The metric you're citing is homes; the metric I'm citing is people. Usually, more than one person over the age of 16 lives in a household, ergo my assertion is not that far out.


You would think Sky would use the assertion as a basis to sell advertising space to twice as many people, but they don't... wonder why?


Because that would be an estimate, and because the number of households reached is a standard measurement.
CH
Charles
^^^

Yeah, I mean there are other people on here who have worked in TV too, and at least in my experience, I have never seen any network try to use "people" measurements over the more standard "households." Maybe it's different on your side of the pond. But you can massage data in any way you want (TV ratings, web hits, etc.) to make any sort of marketing statement you want. A newscast I produced got a 48 share in a diary market in a sweeps month according to Nielsen. I highly doubt *that* many people were really watching our newscast, so I'm not going to let it get to my head that somehow my show was THAT MUCH BETTER with SO MUCH MORE REACH than any of my competitors.

There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
Rkolsen and TROGGLES gave kudos
TR
TROGGLES
Its the swaggering arrogant ethos of the company I cannot abide to hell with the truth just massage the figures. But there is this...

https://speakout.38degrees.org.uk/campaigns/2365?utm_source=email&utm_medium=blast&utm_campaign=11_7_2017_murdoch_signers_kick&bucket=email-blast-11_7_2017_murdoch_signers_kick
SK
Skygeek
Its the swaggering arrogant ethos of the company I cannot abide to hell with the truth just massage the figures. But there is this...

https://speakout.38degrees.org.uk/campaigns/2365?utm_source=email&utm_medium=blast&utm_campaign=11_7_2017_murdoch_signers_kick&bucket=email-blast-11_7_2017_murdoch_signers_kick

Edging dangerously close to personal attack territory here...
LL
London Lite Founding member
All of this over some lighting. Jeez!
TR
TROGGLES
Its the swaggering arrogant ethos of the company I cannot abide to hell with the truth just massage the figures. But there is this...

https://speakout.38degrees.org.uk/campaigns/2365?utm_source=email&utm_medium=blast&utm_campaign=11_7_2017_murdoch_signers_kick&bucket=email-blast-11_7_2017_murdoch_signers_kick

Edging dangerously close to personal attack territory here...

Personal attack on whom... I just read Private Eye. Very Happy
SK
Skygeek
Its the swaggering arrogant ethos of the company I cannot abide to hell with the truth just massage the figures. But there is this...

https://speakout.38degrees.org.uk/campaigns/2365?utm_source=email&utm_medium=blast&utm_campaign=11_7_2017_murdoch_signers_kick&bucket=email-blast-11_7_2017_murdoch_signers_kick

Edging dangerously close to personal attack territory here...

Personal attack on whom... I just read Private Eye. Very Happy

Leave it, babe - s'not werf it! Very Happy
HC
Hatton Cross
(That's enough good natured squabbling. Ed.)

Continuted on page 94 etc..
LV
LondonViewer
Global TV weekly reach of 250m? Pah! Doubt it's even a tenth of that.
GL
globaltraffic24
So, we're now rapidly approaching mid-July and I have yet to see any updates on the new Sky News newsroom and overnight studio. Any updates from insiders? I understand the Brexit/Election shambles pushed things back a little, but I'm surprised we haven't heard any news recently.
IS
Inspector Sands
Global TV weekly reach of 250m? Pah! Doubt it's even a tenth of that.

As Charles mentioned on the previous page, that'll be number of people who's TV sets can get the channel, not how many people are watching.

It's the same as when they say the Superbowl has x hundred million viewers.... it doesn't it's just how many people could watch it

Newer posts