BA
I've worked in a building where the fire alarm was both a bell and manual:
http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/32/86/af/3286aff455b66cef2b4f4a5e432e6f77.jpg
Someone uploaded a video of the fire alarm. As said before it's not particularly interesting.
Also, is Sky Centre the only building in the world that still has an actual bell for their fire alarm?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzNUQIF8BKQ
Also, is Sky Centre the only building in the world that still has an actual bell for their fire alarm?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzNUQIF8BKQ
I've worked in a building where the fire alarm was both a bell and manual:
http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/32/86/af/3286aff455b66cef2b4f4a5e432e6f77.jpg
:-(
A former member
Is this forum about Sky News or Fire Alarms?
NB
I find fire alarms VERY interesting and I have just downloaded that very vid
Someone uploaded a video of the fire alarm. As said before it's not particularly interesting.
Also, is Sky Centre the only building in the world that still has an actual bell for their fire alarm?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzNUQIF8BKQ
Also, is Sky Centre the only building in the world that still has an actual bell for their fire alarm?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzNUQIF8BKQ
I find fire alarms VERY interesting and I have just downloaded that very vid
CI
That is actually a really worrying thing. Because it requires re-editing politicians speeches into making them say something they didn't actually say. It's one of the key tennets of broadcast journalism, editing something in a way that doesn't change the tone or content of what the person is saying. Yes, this is only a promo, but it's not something that actually makes me trust Sky News. In fact, I will not be watching Sky News at all after this, for a while at least, and especially not the Referendum coverage.
On an entirely different note, here's the promo for Sky's referendum coverage. I think it's one of the best we've ever done.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0flxQCmb5oY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0flxQCmb5oY
That is actually a really worrying thing. Because it requires re-editing politicians speeches into making them say something they didn't actually say. It's one of the key tennets of broadcast journalism, editing something in a way that doesn't change the tone or content of what the person is saying. Yes, this is only a promo, but it's not something that actually makes me trust Sky News. In fact, I will not be watching Sky News at all after this, for a while at least, and especially not the Referendum coverage.
SK
That is actually a really worrying thing. Because it requires re-editing politicians speeches into making them say something they didn't actually say. It's one of the key tennets of broadcast journalism, editing something in a way that doesn't change the tone or content of what the person is saying. Yes, this is only a promo, but it's not something that actually makes me trust Sky News. In fact, I will not be watching Sky News at all after this, for a while at least, and especially not the Referendum coverage.
There are... no... words!
On an entirely different note, here's the promo for Sky's referendum coverage. I think it's one of the best we've ever done.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0flxQCmb5oY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0flxQCmb5oY
That is actually a really worrying thing. Because it requires re-editing politicians speeches into making them say something they didn't actually say. It's one of the key tennets of broadcast journalism, editing something in a way that doesn't change the tone or content of what the person is saying. Yes, this is only a promo, but it's not something that actually makes me trust Sky News. In fact, I will not be watching Sky News at all after this, for a while at least, and especially not the Referendum coverage.
There are... no... words!
SP
I think that's a bit over the top. The promo expresses the general attitude of the politicians featured and you don't have to be an anorak or member of this forum to see the edits and understand that the basic principles of how is was produced.
I don't feel that, in broad terms, the position of any of the politicians has been misrepresented in this promo.
I don't feel that, in broad terms, the position of any of the politicians has been misrepresented in this promo.
Last edited by Steve in Pudsey on 6 September 2014 5:30pm
SK
What Steve said!
I think that's a bit over the top. The promo expresses the general attitude of the politicians featured and you don't have to be an anorak or member of this forum to see the edits and understand that the basic pretty pretty principles of how is was produced.
I don't feel that, in broad terms, the position of any of the politicians has been misrepresented in this promo.
I don't feel that, in broad terms, the position of any of the politicians has been misrepresented in this promo.
What Steve said!