It's hard to report on this story without showing the cover. The BBC have shown the cover in reports, with a warning beforehand, which I think is a fair compromise.
It's hard to report on this story without showing the cover. The BBC have shown the cover in reports, with a warning beforehand.
The media haven't quite decided where the line is between
'freedom of expression'
, and
'freedom to offend
', tricky one in anyone's book, but we're no further forward with it, than we were last Wednesday .
Fair enough they've decided not to show the cover, but the way that interview was handled was done without any respect or solidarity. As mentioned the bbc have shown the cover but with a warning. Many things will cause offence, but I don't think it shouldn't be shown. Its a moral dilemma imo.
post edited. just assumed that it was a new poster joining the site for the sake of cloning a thread from another site, couldn't tell on my clunky phone, many apologies
Last edited by ETP1 Forever on 15 January 2015 5:20pm - 2 times in total