BP
All I did was press 'quote'. I can't be held responsible if these new-fangled, magic calculating machines put the wrong thing in the wrong place.
Please don't get arsey with me Bob.
I would be more careful when quoting in the future. Humans operate computers!
I wasn't being remotely arsey with you. I thought it was evidently clear from my response I was, in a light-hearted way, simply pointing out that I'd merely pressed the quote button and hadn't deliberately tried to misquote you or anyone else.
I understand plain text can remove nuance and subtly from what we're trying to say but I find it hard to see why you think I was being arsey.
Anne MacKenzie Fan posted:
Bob Paisley posted:
Anne MacKenzie Fan posted:
whophd
Page 359 - not me though Bob.
No harm done
Page 359 - not me though Bob.
No harm done
All I did was press 'quote'. I can't be held responsible if these new-fangled, magic calculating machines put the wrong thing in the wrong place.
Please don't get arsey with me Bob.
I would be more careful when quoting in the future. Humans operate computers!
I wasn't being remotely arsey with you. I thought it was evidently clear from my response I was, in a light-hearted way, simply pointing out that I'd merely pressed the quote button and hadn't deliberately tried to misquote you or anyone else.
I understand plain text can remove nuance and subtly from what we're trying to say but I find it hard to see why you think I was being arsey.
ST
All I did was press 'quote'. I can't be held responsible if these new-fangled, magic calculating machines put the wrong thing in the wrong place.
Please don't get arsey with me Bob.
I would be more careful when quoting in the future. Humans operate computers!
I wasn't being remotely arsey with you. I thought it was evidently clear from my response I was, in a light-hearted way, simply pointing out that I'd merely pressed the quote button and hadn't deliberately tried to misquote you or anyone else.
I understand plain text can remove nuance and subtly from what we're trying to say but I find it hard to see why you think I was being arsey.
As I said - no harm done - please be careful when quoting. Thanks
Bob Paisley posted:
Anne MacKenzie Fan posted:
Bob Paisley posted:
Anne MacKenzie Fan posted:
whophd
Page 359 - not me though Bob.
No harm done
Page 359 - not me though Bob.
No harm done
All I did was press 'quote'. I can't be held responsible if these new-fangled, magic calculating machines put the wrong thing in the wrong place.
Please don't get arsey with me Bob.
I would be more careful when quoting in the future. Humans operate computers!
I wasn't being remotely arsey with you. I thought it was evidently clear from my response I was, in a light-hearted way, simply pointing out that I'd merely pressed the quote button and hadn't deliberately tried to misquote you or anyone else.
I understand plain text can remove nuance and subtly from what we're trying to say but I find it hard to see why you think I was being arsey.
As I said - no harm done - please be careful when quoting. Thanks
BB
All I did was press 'quote'. I can't be held responsible if these new-fangled, magic calculating machines put the wrong thing in the wrong place.
Please don't get arsey with me Bob.
I would be more careful when quoting in the future. Humans operate computers!
I wasn't being remotely arsey with you. I thought it was evidently clear from my response I was, in a light-hearted way, simply pointing out that I'd merely pressed the quote button and hadn't deliberately tried to misquote you or anyone else.
I understand plain text can remove nuance and subtly from what we're trying to say but I find it hard to see why you think I was being arsey.
I got your attempt at light-hearted humour. Apparently, certain other members are a bit more sensitive. And f_cking stupid.
Bob Paisley posted:
Anne MacKenzie Fan posted:
Bob Paisley posted:
Anne MacKenzie Fan posted:
whophd
Page 359 - not me though Bob.
No harm done
Page 359 - not me though Bob.
No harm done
All I did was press 'quote'. I can't be held responsible if these new-fangled, magic calculating machines put the wrong thing in the wrong place.
Please don't get arsey with me Bob.
I would be more careful when quoting in the future. Humans operate computers!
I wasn't being remotely arsey with you. I thought it was evidently clear from my response I was, in a light-hearted way, simply pointing out that I'd merely pressed the quote button and hadn't deliberately tried to misquote you or anyone else.
I understand plain text can remove nuance and subtly from what we're trying to say but I find it hard to see why you think I was being arsey.
I got your attempt at light-hearted humour. Apparently, certain other members are a bit more sensitive. And f_cking stupid.
DA
I'd be very surprised if they didn't run an advert for how to join Sky especially for Virgin Media customers. VM would technically be powerless to even cut the feed prematurely, as the contract for transmission of the Sky channels runs right up to midnight, and not before.
The old Telewest network has been talking the standard Sky feed for since last weekend and we haven't had a switch advert since then.
Dave
Founding member
BBC LDN posted:
Joe Public posted:
Do you think Sky News will say "and goodbye to our Virgin Media viewers" at 11:58 tonight?
I'd be very surprised if they didn't run an advert for how to join Sky especially for Virgin Media customers. VM would technically be powerless to even cut the feed prematurely, as the contract for transmission of the Sky channels runs right up to midnight, and not before.
The old Telewest network has been talking the standard Sky feed for since last weekend and we haven't had a switch advert since then.
EY
Sky News forgot to put the static bar on top of the ticker and clock on the international feed!
http://www.rp-networkservices.com/tvforum/uploads/ukskynews.jpg
http://www.rp-networkservices.com/tvforum/uploads/ukskynews.jpg
SK
Am i right in saying that the new look Sky News website revamp is due to be happening sometime this month?
GI
The black ticker is even blacker....
Seriously though, Sky News can't be happy that they have lost a potential 3 million viewers - esecially as they are also due to lose the freeview viewers in the summer (subject to Ofcom approval)
Brekkie Boy posted:
I hear the graphics have dramatically improved on the cable version of Sky News! 
The black ticker is even blacker....
Seriously though, Sky News can't be happy that they have lost a potential 3 million viewers - esecially as they are also due to lose the freeview viewers in the summer (subject to Ofcom approval)