JO
Well, so far we've heard from Wikipedia:
Mark Longhurst is anchoring Sky News Today AM with Anna Jones
Martin Stanford is anchoring Sky News Today PM with Julie Etchingham
The graphics will get a change to co-incide with the changes on the Website, which launches in March.
All from January 29th - Intresting if true!
Mark Longhurst is anchoring Sky News Today AM with Anna Jones
Martin Stanford is anchoring Sky News Today PM with Julie Etchingham
The graphics will get a change to co-incide with the changes on the Website, which launches in March.
All from January 29th - Intresting if true!
BB
Will SKY NEWS with Martin Stanford still be on if he is going back to doing SKY NEWS Today
JW
.......he sometimes forgets and introduces a little bit of drama into his presenting, methinks......
derek500 posted:
As Martin does amateur dramatics as a hobby, perhaps he wants a day job again to keep his evenings free?
.......he sometimes forgets and introduces a little bit of drama into his presenting, methinks......
CA
Oh, for god's sake.
It is on WIKIPEDIA.
Don't you think Sky might've issued a press release first if they were going to reshuffle their presenter pack so fundamentally?
Look at the Wikipedia article and track who had made the edits.
There really is a striking amount of idiocy on this site sometimes.
It is on WIKIPEDIA.
Don't you think Sky might've issued a press release first if they were going to reshuffle their presenter pack so fundamentally?
Look at the Wikipedia article and track who had made the edits.
There really is a striking amount of idiocy on this site sometimes.
GI
Well I've emailed Paul Bromley about this and he responded to me 
with this:
''Hello
Thank you for your email.
Ignore Wikipedia about the presenter changes. None of it is true.
As for the graphics, yes, they are changing but not on January 29. I have put a comment on my blog about this in response to other viewers' comments http://skynews3.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/01/picture_this.html
Best wishes
Paul Bromley
Viewers' Editor
Sky News''
with this:
''Hello
Thank you for your email.
Ignore Wikipedia about the presenter changes. None of it is true.
As for the graphics, yes, they are changing but not on January 29. I have put a comment on my blog about this in response to other viewers' comments http://skynews3.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/01/picture_this.html
Best wishes
Paul Bromley
Viewers' Editor
Sky News''
... well just goes to show, never believe Wikipedia.
JL
Paul Bromley: Sky's Viewpoint Blog posted:
.
Graphics: Wikipedia is wrong about the date. It is one of the inherent dangers of the internet that not all the information is correct.
But I think wikipedia did get it right when the entry said: "Many other channels have attempted to mimick (sic) and emulate Sky's standards and methods with varying degrees of success."
It is no secret that we are working on a change to our graphics look. It will concentrate initially on what we call the "lower third" of the screen .
Our current plan is to make the change in the next few weeks - but not January 29.
Titles/look: This is a longer-term project and you won't see the changes until the spring at the earliest.
Globe: As I said in the "Spanning The Globe", our international coverage is more - much more - than just the issue of whether we restore the globe to our title sequence.
Graphics: Wikipedia is wrong about the date. It is one of the inherent dangers of the internet that not all the information is correct.
But I think wikipedia did get it right when the entry said: "Many other channels have attempted to mimick (sic) and emulate Sky's standards and methods with varying degrees of success."
It is no secret that we are working on a change to our graphics look. It will concentrate initially on what we call the "lower third" of the screen .
Our current plan is to make the change in the next few weeks - but not January 29.
Titles/look: This is a longer-term project and you won't see the changes until the spring at the earliest.
Globe: As I said in the "Spanning The Globe", our international coverage is more - much more - than just the issue of whether we restore the globe to our title sequence.