ST
It may be...but ratings for time slots have not improved despite a well publicised (not to mention expensive) revamp. I have to say that 'I think' that The Sky Report is better.
Although, I think that any change may be radical; they are obviously being reactionary, so whether there will actually be better programming is questionable; this is a massive red face so soon after a revamp.
I think front line names may face the chop, and was always bemused at them bringing in new presenters in the first place!!
We'll soon find out though!
fusionlad posted:
Lunchtime Live is one the better performing ATV shows though isn't it?
It may be...but ratings for time slots have not improved despite a well publicised (not to mention expensive) revamp. I have to say that 'I think' that The Sky Report is better.
Although, I think that any change may be radical; they are obviously being reactionary, so whether there will actually be better programming is questionable; this is a massive red face so soon after a revamp.
I think front line names may face the chop, and was always bemused at them bringing in new presenters in the first place!!
We'll soon find out though!
FE
I think front line names may face the chop, and was always bemused at them bringing in new presenters in the first place!!
They should offer (the retired ?) Viv Creegor a financial incentive to come back, if only at weekends. In my opinion, Sky has not had a more adept, measured and personable female anchor.
Anne MacKenzie Fan posted:
I think front line names may face the chop, and was always bemused at them bringing in new presenters in the first place!!
They should offer (the retired ?) Viv Creegor a financial incentive to come back, if only at weekends. In my opinion, Sky has not had a more adept, measured and personable female anchor.
:-(
Just revert back to what you use to do best - Rolling News, with the odd programme at the weekend - keep the Saturday/Sunday Live
HA
I think front line names may face the chop, and was always bemused at them bringing in new presenters in the first place!!
They should offer (the retired ?) Viv Creegor a financial incentive to come back, if only at weekends. In my opinion, Sky has not had a more adept, measured and personable female anchor.
But will Vivian Creegor want to do all that walking around
harshy
Founding member
fernando posted:
Anne MacKenzie Fan posted:
I think front line names may face the chop, and was always bemused at them bringing in new presenters in the first place!!
They should offer (the retired ?) Viv Creegor a financial incentive to come back, if only at weekends. In my opinion, Sky has not had a more adept, measured and personable female anchor.
But will Vivian Creegor want to do all that walking around