NE
newsman1
Not terror related and it says so right in the article
Apologies.
I didn't read the article fully.
IS
Though the distinction between something that is 'terrorism' and something that isn't seems to be fairly arbitrary.
Not terror related and it says so right in the article
Though the distinction between something that is 'terrorism' and something that isn't seems to be fairly arbitrary.
MA
Though the distinction between something that is 'terrorism' and something that isn't seems to be fairly arbitrary.
Indeed. Viz Top Tip: If you find yourself getting shot, make sure it's not by a terrorist, non terrorist inflicted gun shots are not as serious.
Not terror related and it says so right in the article
Though the distinction between something that is 'terrorism' and something that isn't seems to be fairly arbitrary.
Indeed. Viz Top Tip: If you find yourself getting shot, make sure it's not by a terrorist, non terrorist inflicted gun shots are not as serious.
CH
Though the distinction between something that is 'terrorism' and something that isn't seems to be fairly arbitrary.
Terrorism is for political gain. Quite a clear distinction.
Not terror related and it says so right in the article
Though the distinction between something that is 'terrorism' and something that isn't seems to be fairly arbitrary.
Terrorism is for political gain. Quite a clear distinction.
MA
Though the distinction between something that is 'terrorism' and something that isn't seems to be fairly arbitrary.
Terrorism is for political gain. Quite a clear distinction.
On a terrorist's list of objectives when he goes on a killing spree, is fear through publicly, when a regular 'nutjob' does the same, that's probably way down his list, if at all.
The media need to be very careful not to present the former's actions any differently, or more extensively than the latter's.
Ultimately both are simply deranged individuals.
Not terror related and it says so right in the article
Though the distinction between something that is 'terrorism' and something that isn't seems to be fairly arbitrary.
Terrorism is for political gain. Quite a clear distinction.
On a terrorist's list of objectives when he goes on a killing spree, is fear through publicly, when a regular 'nutjob' does the same, that's probably way down his list, if at all.
The media need to be very careful not to present the former's actions any differently, or more extensively than the latter's.
Ultimately both are simply deranged individuals.
Last edited by Markymark on 25 March 2017 5:19pm
WO
Terrorism is for political gain. Quite a clear distinction.
On a terrorist's list of objectives when he goes on a killing spree, is fear through publicly, when a regular 'nutjob' does the same, that's probably way down his list, if at all.
The media need to be very careful not to present the former's actions any differently, or more extensively than the latter's.
Ultimately both are simply deranged individuals.
He or she.
Though the distinction between something that is 'terrorism' and something that isn't seems to be fairly arbitrary.
Terrorism is for political gain. Quite a clear distinction.
On a terrorist's list of objectives when he goes on a killing spree, is fear through publicly, when a regular 'nutjob' does the same, that's probably way down his list, if at all.
The media need to be very careful not to present the former's actions any differently, or more extensively than the latter's.
Ultimately both are simply deranged individuals.
He or she.
BA
Terrorism is for political gain. Quite a clear distinction.
On a terrorist's list of objectives when he goes on a killing spree, is fear through publicly, when a regular 'nutjob' does the same, that's probably way down his list, if at all.
The media need to be very careful not to present the former's actions any differently, or more extensively than the latter's.
Ultimately both are simply deranged individuals.
He or she.
How dare you reduce terrorism to binary gender. There's nothing to say that a terrorist can't be agender, pangender, gender fluid, non-binary, or a furry otherkin assigned human at birth.
Terrorism is for political gain. Quite a clear distinction.
On a terrorist's list of objectives when he goes on a killing spree, is fear through publicly, when a regular 'nutjob' does the same, that's probably way down his list, if at all.
The media need to be very careful not to present the former's actions any differently, or more extensively than the latter's.
Ultimately both are simply deranged individuals.
He or she.
How dare you reduce terrorism to binary gender. There's nothing to say that a terrorist can't be agender, pangender, gender fluid, non-binary, or a furry otherkin assigned human at birth.
Last edited by bilky asko on 25 March 2017 6:36pm