Goodness me, Sput! You joined us way back in 1970...
It's been a while since I last posted, but I've been here for some time, quietly flirting with the British establishment. My posts were never about TV back then, either. I just like to call out Stu when he's wrong about science
Sky News must have been at least a good half hour ahead of N24 when i was watching earlier.
Sky were on rolling coverage with JT while N24 carried the six o clock news from BBC ONE and then continued on with Entertainment 24(which is an appaling programme).
But then you get to the argument as to whether news channels should roll with a story about something that might happen or whether they should just keep updating when something new comes in and at the top of every bulletin...
Steering things on topic Look East has is providing fairly informative bulletins this morning, using a different backdrop on their screen instead of the usual plain red.
Steering things on topic Look East has is providing fairly informative bulletins this morning, using a different backdrop on their screen instead of the usual plain red.
Steering things on topic Look East has is providing fairly informative bulletins this morning, using a different backdrop on their screen instead of the usual plain red.
Did anyone else find over the past few days the coverage of the floods in the 50s was a bit odd? Very few reports gave the fatalities from those floods, just the rather Newsround-esque reporting that "many" people died. But from what I've seen "many" means around 300. Was this figure not quoted to avoid mass hysteria or because such a figure is just too mind-boggling in our health and safety, risk assessment society?
