The Newsroom

The Royal Baby

It's a boy! Announced at 2030 on Monday 22nd July 2013. (July 2013)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
BA
bilky asko
It could be seventy years before this kid becomes king or queen. Who knows, by then Britain might've seen sense and become a republic.

Even Republic admit that they're a minority group. The Monster Raving Loony Party have done more good as a campaigning force than Republic, which by definition is campaigning for something that will result in everyone being worse off.
WW
WW Update
It could be seventy years before this kid becomes king or queen. Who knows, by then Britain might've seen sense and become a republic.

Even Republic admit that they're a minority group. The Monster Raving Loony Party have done more good as a campaigning force than Republic, which by definition is campaigning for something that will result in everyone being worse off.


Most countries in Europe (and the world), including some of the most successful ones, are republics. How are they worse off by not having people from a certain family being named head-of-state solely by the virtue of their birth into that family? I'm not British, so it's not my decision to make, but I would argue that monarchies -- whatever their entertainment value -- are laughably anachronistic in the 21st century.

I can't imagine that any European country will still be a monarchy 70 years from now.
Last edited by WW Update on 22 July 2013 3:05pm - 2 times in total
WE
Westy2
Newswatch has finished for a few weeks, hasn't it?

(Rather convientley, some might say!)

Why can't someone else present it, while Samira takes a break?
BA
bilky asko
It could be seventy years before this kid becomes king or queen. Who knows, by then Britain might've seen sense and become a republic.

Even Republic admit that they're a minority group. The Monster Raving Loony Party have done more good as a campaigning force than Republic, which by definition is campaigning for something that will result in everyone being worse off.


Most countries in Europe (and the world), including some of the most successful ones, are republics. How are they worse off by not having people from a certain family being named head-of-state solely by the virtue of their birth into that family? I'm not British, so it's not my decision to make, but I would argue that monarchies -- whatever their entertainment value -- are laughably anachronistic in the 21st century.

I can't imagine that any European country will still be a monarchy 70 years from now.


It's not as if our country is a dictatorship or an absolute monarchy; we don't lack the freedoms of a republic (this is where the Republic movement falls down). Our figure-head gives us a lot of so-called soft power. It also gives us working history, as well as the economic benefits.

If we really want to throw away heritage and history for pseudo-modernity, we might as well demolish the Houses of Parliament and move into a soulless abomination like that used by the Scottish Parliament - in the name of progress and modernity...
JW
JamesWorldNews
Ah, Kay Burley. Thy is greatness.
GI
ginnyfan
^^ She's a trooper, all day long on air and she loves every minute of it.

Even the usual Twitter hating on her is less than before. Think her joining it helped her image.
CA
Cando
^^ She's a trooper, all day long on air and she loves every minute of it.

Even the usual Twitter hating on her is less than before. Think her joining it helped her image
.


Shocked No there is just bit of a difference between a fluffy Royal event and insensitively hounding volunteers looking for a missing child. Does that really have to be spelt out?
GI
ginnyfan
^ Well Kay got vile Twitter hating on many other occasions, not just for that. Today and especially last hour or so, she's getting more praise than hate. Shocked
WW
WW Update

It's not as if our country is a dictatorship or an absolute monarchy; we don't lack the freedoms of a republic (this is where the Republic movement falls down). Our figure-head gives us a lot of so-called soft power. It also gives us working history, as well as the economic benefits.


Well, my disagreement is based on your suggestion that replacing the monarchy with a republic is likely to make the UK -- or any country -- "worse off" than before. The citizens of, say, the United States, Germany, or France are in no way worse off because they live in republics. These countries are not merely as stable and prosperous as the UK, with strong national identities; they also exercise a great deal of (in)direct political and cultural influence ("soft power") on the global scene. As for a working history, do France or the U.S. -- or small countries such as Switzerland -- have less of it merely because they are republics?
Last edited by WW Update on 22 July 2013 5:05pm - 2 times in total
NE
newmocker
Kay Burley still going at St Mary's hospital. Meanwhile, another change at Buckingham palace. First we had Dermot then Colin Brazier now Jeremy Thompson has taken over.

A long afternoon for Kay!
RO
rob Founding member
Joanna Gosling replacing Jane Hill on BBC News. Tim Willcox in the studio.
FL
flaziola
Also a long afternoon for her former colleague Simon McCoy, 5 bells and he's also still outside the hospital, Jane Hill has been replaced by Joanna Gosling and seeing as he more or less lives there, Tim Wilcox is on standby in Studio C.

Newer posts