NG
So to be more accurate - the area of the studio news are using is tiny...
Presumably they aren't able to have a more flexible studio that could be fully utilised by both programme areas for either artistic reasons (they want them to look more different than they think could be achieved in the same area) - or a cost thing, in that they don't have the staffing to turn round studios and have found it cheaper to have two permanent standing sets?
(Though one could argue that having two permanent sets in the same studio, is wasting half a studio for both shows, and poor value for money, if you wanted to take that tack)
noggin
Founding member
Hermes posted:
The studio itself is not tiny - it's the problem that the news set shares with the sport set, so news only have half the studio.
So to be more accurate - the area of the studio news are using is tiny...
Presumably they aren't able to have a more flexible studio that could be fully utilised by both programme areas for either artistic reasons (they want them to look more different than they think could be achieved in the same area) - or a cost thing, in that they don't have the staffing to turn round studios and have found it cheaper to have two permanent standing sets?
(Though one could argue that having two permanent sets in the same studio, is wasting half a studio for both shows, and poor value for money, if you wanted to take that tack)