JO
But UK public service broadcasters have a duty to be 'balanced' at least.
I don't think they are being, they are repeating propoganda.
What choice would they have if they couldn't find anyone to say "this is a bad thing"?
Don't they have a duty to find someone to provide that view?
Perhaps I wouldn't agree with it: but surely there is an argument here that someone has been assassinated? An individual is being lambasted by the media as responsible for crimes they haven't been charged with, convicted or sentenced for.
Surely it's wrong for PSBs to take such a one-sided view without such a process having taken place?
I appreciate that Bin Laden doesn't probably deserve the defence of such rules, but they are there for a reason.
I've heard BBC News repeatedly say that everyone from Obama to Milliband has spoken of the need to be cautious about vengeance.
But UK public service broadcasters have a duty to be 'balanced' at least.
I don't think they are being, they are repeating propoganda.
What choice would they have if they couldn't find anyone to say "this is a bad thing"?
Don't they have a duty to find someone to provide that view?
Perhaps I wouldn't agree with it: but surely there is an argument here that someone has been assassinated? An individual is being lambasted by the media as responsible for crimes they haven't been charged with, convicted or sentenced for.
Surely it's wrong for PSBs to take such a one-sided view without such a process having taken place?
I appreciate that Bin Laden doesn't probably deserve the defence of such rules, but they are there for a reason.
I've heard BBC News repeatedly say that everyone from Obama to Milliband has spoken of the need to be cautious about vengeance.