SP
Is it just me getting fed up of seeing the same interviewees all the time on news channels and programmes?
It just smacks of lazy journalism that every time there's a vaguely travel related story, Simon Calder, travel writer from The Independent, is wheeled out in all his creepy wide-mouthed glory. And it doesn't seem to matter which channel. In fact I wonder how he manages to find time to write for The Independent when he always seems to be on one channel or another. Surely there are other people who can talk about travel related issues.
He's by no means the only suspect. There are other campaigners for civil liberties than Shami Chakrabarti of Liberty, other aviation experts than Christian Wolmar, and other commentators on Royal issues than Dickie Arbiter. So the list goes on.
I accept that these people may know their stuff, be media friendly, and easily available, but surely getting a range of views is more important.
I also think it can send out the wrong message, particularly in the case of Shami Chakrabarti. The lack of other interviewees championing civil liberties could easily give the impression that she's a one-woman campaign, and a lone voice - a position which arguably could undermine the civil liberty movement as a whole.
I'd be interested to know others' thoughts.
It just smacks of lazy journalism that every time there's a vaguely travel related story, Simon Calder, travel writer from The Independent, is wheeled out in all his creepy wide-mouthed glory. And it doesn't seem to matter which channel. In fact I wonder how he manages to find time to write for The Independent when he always seems to be on one channel or another. Surely there are other people who can talk about travel related issues.
He's by no means the only suspect. There are other campaigners for civil liberties than Shami Chakrabarti of Liberty, other aviation experts than Christian Wolmar, and other commentators on Royal issues than Dickie Arbiter. So the list goes on.
I accept that these people may know their stuff, be media friendly, and easily available, but surely getting a range of views is more important.
I also think it can send out the wrong message, particularly in the case of Shami Chakrabarti. The lack of other interviewees championing civil liberties could easily give the impression that she's a one-woman campaign, and a lone voice - a position which arguably could undermine the civil liberty movement as a whole.
I'd be interested to know others' thoughts.