NO
I agree that it was covered well in the sense that Mark Austin is excellent on location but the majority of the reports were unquestioningly patrotic and shallow, especially considering the whole programme was devoted to it. Thelead story (I think) was emphasizing Harry the hero, and referring to the fighting in terms of the British responding to the Talibans attacks/onslaught. Contrast that to Channel 4's lead (followed up with a great interview from Snow)... in terms of quality the latter was streets ahead.
Brekkie posted:
Whatever your opinion on the story, ITV News covered it extremely well on the Evening News and are the only organisation to have their host out there, which may seem pointless but really does make them feel closer to the story.
I agree that it was covered well in the sense that Mark Austin is excellent on location but the majority of the reports were unquestioningly patrotic and shallow, especially considering the whole programme was devoted to it. Thelead story (I think) was emphasizing Harry the hero, and referring to the fighting in terms of the British responding to the Talibans attacks/onslaught. Contrast that to Channel 4's lead (followed up with a great interview from Snow)... in terms of quality the latter was streets ahead.