The Newsroom

MOD to request 'Media Blackout' for Prince Harry

(May 2007)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
CO
Connews
This from The Observer:

Quote:
Revelations about the deployment of Prince Harry to a war zone will be censored if the government agrees to a proposal that future information surrounding his military career is covered by a D-notice.
A D-notice - an official request to newspaper editors not to publish items on specified subjects for reasons of national security - can apply to individuals if there is thought to be a 'grave threat' to their safety.

Last week General Sir Richard Dannatt, the chief of the general staff, announced that 22-year-old Harry would not be joining fellow members of the Blues and Royals of the Household Cavalry in Iraq because he and his squadron would face unacceptable risks.

In making his decision, Dannatt showed his frustration at media coverage of the Prince's deployment.
'A contributing factor to the threat to Prince Harry has been the widespread knowledge and discussion of his deployment,' he said.

'This close scrutiny has exacerbated the situation and this is something I wish to avoid in the future.'

The Observer can reveal that Ministry of Defence officials are preparing a briefing paper for Bill Jeffrey, the department's permanent secretary, who chairs the Defence Press and Broadcasting Advisory committee, that would recommend to other members that Harry's movements be censored. They include representatives from the Home Office, the Foreign Office and the Cabinet Office and the media.

The committee has the power to recommend that the media does not publish information that 'involves grave danger to the to the state and or individuals'. The particular order that would be used is known as D.A. Notice Four. Now the MoD is considering a proposal to extend coverage so that it would include members of the royal family. 'The idea would be to broaden the coverage of notice 4 so that it included the prince,' an MoD source told The Observer. 'It is a perfectly reasonable step to take given what has happened over the past few weeks.'

The prince - the third in line to the throne - had been scheduled to serve with the Blues and Royals for a six-month tour of duty and would have taken command of four Scimitar armoured vehicles with 11 men under his command. The deployment of Harry's regiment was originally revealed on the Ministry of Defence's own website, a policy decision that has subsequently been criticised.

Threats were made that the Prince would be either killed or taken hostage.

Yesterday, in Iraq, the Prime Minister refused to discuss the decision concerning Harry, although troops on the ground welcomed the order.


All discussion here.
BR
Brekkie
It should have been the case from the start - today in the News of the World they give details of plans to send Harry on a "secret mission" to Iraq.


And not just for Harry, the reporting of the movement of all British forces should be tightly controlled.
GA
Gallunach
Quote:
A D-notice - an official request to newspaper editors not to publish items on specified subjects for reasons of national security - can apply to individuals if there is thought to be a 'grave threat' to their safety.


A D notice only applies in Britain and as far as I understand it there is no legal sanction in breaking it .

Which means that if the current situation in regards to information about him continues and a D notice is applied the only people who wouldn't know about his movements inside Britain are people without interent access.

If they don't want people to know about his movements then make all his news of his movements Top Secret and only on a need to know basis.
GI
gilsta
Gallunach posted:
If they don't want people to know about his movements then make all his news of his movements Top Secret and only on a need to know basis.


That's simply not practical, unless he joins the SAS. Any movement of his regiment would raise suspicions and you cannot gag en entire regiment!
BI
birdie100
However, whilst you argue that a regiment cannot be gagged, it is possible to do that - if they are all aware that their lives depend on it. This would literally be the case - if Harry goes with the Blues and Royals, which I suspect he will, then it is in the troops best interests to keep quiet. Should it be mentioned that he is there, serving with them, then his safety, and thereby theirs, is to a far greater extent compromised. What is to stop the "decision" simply being a smokescreen?
JS
Janner south west
Why did the military release his movements? My dad when he is in the Navy know where he is going but he is not allowed to release the information and neither does the MoD, RN or any other Armed Force.

It is to give the moving force security! So nobody targets them!! Why did they feel the need to tell the media where Harry was going?
MH
miss hellfire
Well common sense would tell you that you don't broadcast to the enemy where the prize head is going on manouvres. Really, it was a stupid move to broadcast that to the world.

No-one should have been told until he'd returned from his active posting in Iraq or Afghanistan or wherever they chose to post him and his men.

Newer posts