Perhaps it will be more of a part-time role with Mark dividing his time between Washington and London and with it the inability to take on the full time nature of being a US Editor.
It's not a surprise as such, but I agree with the sentiment of your post.
If Mark's only signed for a year, has someone else been appointed US editor (or similar title) but isn't due to start for some time because of personal circumstances/ work commitments?
It's not a surprise as such, but I agree with the sentiment of your post.
If Mark's only signed for a year, has someone else been appointed US editor (or similar title) but isn't due to start for some time because of personal circumstances/ work commitments?
Who - other than you guys - suggested there is to be any such thing as a U..S. Editor?
I'd also suggest your prognostication (perhaps unwittingly) strays into the realm of speculation about someone's personal life, which I would submit isn't in the best-of-taste. Please just wait and see... everyone's reading far too much into it.
I'm not saying that necessarily the presenters/reporters and the actual work in front of the cameras, but surely there is going to be some pooling of resources for other things
I'm not saying that necessarily the presenters/reporters and the actual work in front of the cameras, but surely there is going to be some pooling of resources for other things
I wouldn't wish to count chickens before they hatch.
:-(
A former member
The way things are going Fox could replace the news channel with UK style SKY news channel.
