LJ
Agreed. I watched BBC News from 4pm when the news was announced. They had Nicholas Witchell in the studio to discuss it. IMO it should have ended at that but they then went on to speak to a doctor, daily express correspondent, Jennie Bond and I think someone else. None of this really added anything extra and the detail they went into was quite unnecessary at times.
I agree there is very little to talk about other that the simple fact that she is sick. All the rest tends to be b*****it from people simply speculating, including the various GPs blabbering on about what the queen might have/have not. However, on the other hand I think the channels would come in for a lot of criticism if all they gave to the story was two minutes at the top of the hour (even though theres nothing more to add) given that it is the head of state that is in hospital.
The Royal Family they may be but surely they deserve some basic human courtesy when it comes to such medical matters - even the information released yesterday wasn't enough and journalists were prying for more information when there was little more to the story than the Queen having the ****.
Agreed. I watched BBC News from 4pm when the news was announced. They had Nicholas Witchell in the studio to discuss it. IMO it should have ended at that but they then went on to speak to a doctor, daily express correspondent, Jennie Bond and I think someone else. None of this really added anything extra and the detail they went into was quite unnecessary at times.
I agree there is very little to talk about other that the simple fact that she is sick. All the rest tends to be b*****it from people simply speculating, including the various GPs blabbering on about what the queen might have/have not. However, on the other hand I think the channels would come in for a lot of criticism if all they gave to the story was two minutes at the top of the hour (even though theres nothing more to add) given that it is the head of state that is in hospital.
