IS
I don't really see what was wrong with it either. It was a lot better than what they could have done which is 4 hours of long shots of random boats with dry voice over.
I don't think they could have covered it in the way they did without having a lot of presenters. It's wasn't a single location event - it happened over a wide area and once a presenter and crew is on a boat they are there until the end. So unless they wanted to mess things up by having a speed boat shuttling between the proper boats they needed a lot of presenters
However not all were necessary - I'm still not sure what Anneka Rice's bit was about
I don't the BBC were too far wrong with their efforts - I'd have just put Huw on commentary rather than in a studio away from the action bookending the show and just cut down the number of reporters they had around - only Claire was really in a position of interest. I'm sure the Daily Mail will take great delight in slamming the number of people involved tomorrow.
I don't really see what was wrong with it either. It was a lot better than what they could have done which is 4 hours of long shots of random boats with dry voice over.
I don't think they could have covered it in the way they did without having a lot of presenters. It's wasn't a single location event - it happened over a wide area and once a presenter and crew is on a boat they are there until the end. So unless they wanted to mess things up by having a speed boat shuttling between the proper boats they needed a lot of presenters
However not all were necessary - I'm still not sure what Anneka Rice's bit was about