The Newsroom

London Mayoral & Local Election(s) Coverage 2012

BBC One/Two, BBC News Channel & Sky News Presentation Discussion (April 2012)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
GH
George Hill
What do we think of Jon Sopel taking main election duties, succeeding Dimbleby whenever that will be? I think he'd easily be the best candidate to follow on from David judging by last night.

And definitely credit to Emily and Jeremy. Two very very good broadcasters, and both very versatile too.


Although I think Paxman would like the role, and may for a few years get it, in the long term I think it is more likely to be Emily or Jeremy who take over as main anchor. Although Jon would also be a good choice - his news channel experience must be valuable when anchoring that type of programme. It would also be good if he could be used as a sort of 'election specialist' as he also anchors things like the french election tomorrow night. I would really like it if the bbc covered more international elections. The other candidate must be Nick Robinson, depending what he does post-political editor. If he was to get question time or newsnight the role could be his.


I can't see them choosing Emily Maitliss to be Dimbleby's eventual successor. She's a bit lightweight for such a big role. If you asked someone to name a well-known BBC political presenter, I'm sure she wouldn't be top of the list. Paxman or Sopel are more likely, although my money's going on Huw Edwards. He's already filling David's role as the State occasions presenter and he was a political correspondent for BBC News before he took the Six O'Clock News presenting job in May 1999. So, his wealth of experience and general popularity with viewers would surely make him the favourite?


The big suggestion that it could be Edwards is his role in covering welsh elections. I completely disagree that Emily Maitlis is too lightweight - she presents Newsnight (and could well be Paxman's successor) wheras Edwards presents the news at ten which in my books makes her a tougher political person. The BBC must have a 'what if' plan for all their senior presenters, but especially the older ones. It would be interesting to know what it is.
GE
thegeek Founding member
Bit late to the game here, as I was away all weekend and missed all the coverage...
Explanation of how Jeremy Vine's graphics are put together:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-17920260


note at 1m12, there's a monitor with a Blue Peter logo on the side of it. The virtual set was in TC2 this year.
WO
Worzel
Jeremy Vine for Question Time surely. He has the personality, knowledge and credentials to fit the role perfectly. They also need to find something for Jeremy to do in the longterm, he can't just appear during elections!
PE
Pete Founding member
Jeremy Vine for Question Time surely. He has the personality, knowledge and credentials to fit the role perfectly. They also need to find something for Jeremy to do in the longterm, he can't just appear during elections!


Urgh no. He's far too confrontational and not in the subtle manner Dimbleby has. It'd be like a BBC version of the Wright Stuff.
SW
Steve Williams
They also need to find something for Jeremy to do in the longterm, he can't just appear during elections!


They have something for him to do, he does a radio show five days a week.
GH
George Hill
They also need to find something for Jeremy to do in the longterm, he can't just appear during elections!


They have something for him to do, he does a radio show five days a week.


But surely he is not going to do radio 2 forever. I think what Worzel was getting at is they will have to find him a role within news in the longterm. It seems to me that such a role is only going to come from Radio 4 or Newsnight. But he has done Newsnight, so may not want to go back. Maybe the Daily Politics?
LJ
Live at five with Jeremy
I think Eggheads is about the limit of his capabilities.
GH
George Hill
I think Eggheads is about the limit of his capabilities.


To be fair I think he has been excellent over the last few elections. I never saw him on Newsnight, but his radio 2 interviews are very good, as has been anything else I've seen him do. And, whatever we think of him, the BBC clearly see him as a rising star - which is why it is interesting to speculate what he is rising to!
IT
itsrobert Founding member
They also need to find something for Jeremy to do in the longterm, he can't just appear during elections!


They have something for him to do, he does a radio show five days a week.


But surely he is not going to do radio 2 forever. I think what Worzel was getting at is they will have to find him a role within news in the longterm . It seems to me that such a role is only going to come from Radio 4 or Newsnight. But he has done Newsnight, so may not want to go back. Maybe the Daily Politics?


Why? Confused BBC Radio 2 has had a news-based lunchtime phone-in for as long as I can remember. Jeremy's hosted it for years now, ever since Jimmy Young retired and I think it's probably fairly popular with the public. Why can't he stay on that for as long as he wants? After all, Dimbleby has done Question Time and Paxman Newsnight for years and years and no-one seems to have a problem with that. Why must Jeremy Vine return to BBC News all of a sudden?
GH
George Hill
They also need to find something for Jeremy to do in the longterm, he can't just appear during elections!


They have something for him to do, he does a radio show five days a week.


But surely he is not going to do radio 2 forever. I think what Worzel was getting at is they will have to find him a role within news in the longterm . It seems to me that such a role is only going to come from Radio 4 or Newsnight. But he has done Newsnight, so may not want to go back. Maybe the Daily Politics?


Why? Confused BBC Radio 2 has had a news-based lunchtime phone-in for as long as I can remember. Jeremy's hosted it for years now, ever since Jimmy Young retired and I think it's probably fairly popular with the public. Why can't he stay on that for as long as he wants? After all, Dimbleby has done Question Time and Paxman Newsnight for years and years and no-one seems to have a problem with that. Why must Jeremy Vine return to BBC News all of a sudden?


I'm not suggesting he is about to be thrown off his show and I certainly don't have a problem with him on radio 2. I just don't think he will stay on radio 2 forever and will want a new challenge - and the question is - where could that be?
JO
Jon
Pete posted:
Jeremy Vine for Question Time surely. He has the personality, knowledge and credentials to fit the role perfectly. They also need to find something for Jeremy to do in the longterm, he can't just appear during elections!


Urgh no. He's far too confrontational and not in the subtle manner Dimbleby has.

I agree, but who could be a suitable replacement for Dimbleby?

I think there is likely to be a lot of disappointment with whoever it will be.
AP
aprilj
Pete posted:
Jeremy Vine for Question Time surely. He has the personality, knowledge and credentials to fit the role perfectly. They also need to find something for Jeremy to do in the longterm, he can't just appear during elections!


Urgh no. He's far too confrontational and not in the subtle manner Dimbleby has.

I agree, but who could be a suitable replacement for Dimbleby?

I think there is likely to be a lot of disappointment with whoever it will be.


When Dimbleby leaves surely Jeremy Paxman or Huw Edwards?

Though I would love Emily Maitlis to because she is an excellent and I don't agree with the earlier comment about her being too lightweight. Like someone else said she does present Newsnight!

Newer posts