NG
Don't think the maths on that add up. Freeview and analogue homes significantly outnumber satellite households, so ITV would almost certainly lose more than half of their potential audience. The satellite uplink costs are small change compared to this - and I suspect that even the one-off revenue generated from selling off their regional sites wouldn't really compensate for this loss in income...
Without a terrestrial slot, ITV would simply not be the same, and wouldn't be able to fund the same level of production - and the chances of their shareholders accepting such a move are pretty small.
noggin
Founding member
StuartPlymouth posted:
I certainly don't want ITV West & Westcountry to merge. The facilities in Bristol are probably far better than the meagre offerings on Langage Science Park in Plympton, so no doubt that's where it would be based.
I'm sure they would initially try to cover the whole region and continue with the sub-regional opts, but I couldn't see that lasting for financial reasons. The area would be too large and diverse to cover.
I don't know why ITV don't just admit they can't afford to meet their obligations and hand back the licences to Ofcom. They could still broadcast on DCab and DSat as a single network even if they lost their privileged DTT allocation. They would also save shed-loads of money on multiple DSat feeds and think of the income from selling all those regional facilities.
Leave regional TV to the BBC, they sem to be better at it anyway.
I'm sure they would initially try to cover the whole region and continue with the sub-regional opts, but I couldn't see that lasting for financial reasons. The area would be too large and diverse to cover.
I don't know why ITV don't just admit they can't afford to meet their obligations and hand back the licences to Ofcom. They could still broadcast on DCab and DSat as a single network even if they lost their privileged DTT allocation. They would also save shed-loads of money on multiple DSat feeds and think of the income from selling all those regional facilities.
Leave regional TV to the BBC, they sem to be better at it anyway.
Don't think the maths on that add up. Freeview and analogue homes significantly outnumber satellite households, so ITV would almost certainly lose more than half of their potential audience. The satellite uplink costs are small change compared to this - and I suspect that even the one-off revenue generated from selling off their regional sites wouldn't really compensate for this loss in income...
Without a terrestrial slot, ITV would simply not be the same, and wouldn't be able to fund the same level of production - and the chances of their shareholders accepting such a move are pretty small.