MA
[quote="abcrhysabc"]
plus surely that would apply to every single thing ITV make but they've done pretty well for themselves for the last fifty years
Not necessarily, because ITV programmes are very different to BBC programmes. But when it comes down to news, I think they're wasting their time, because it's just news. It is bound to be exactly the same, because it is on the terrestrial news programmes
But surely you can see the difference between a networked bulletin and a rolling news channel. I think "news" can be done differently, just watch Channel 4 News, More 4 News and then something like Sky News, there is a clear difference between all of them and to a certain degree I would agree that ITV need to find a niche (many the entertainment side of things, if I were asked) to work well.
Hymagumba posted:
abcrhysabc posted:
plus surely that would apply to every single thing ITV make but they've done pretty well for themselves for the last fifty years
Not necessarily, because ITV programmes are very different to BBC programmes. But when it comes down to news, I think they're wasting their time, because it's just news. It is bound to be exactly the same, because it is on the terrestrial news programmes
But surely you can see the difference between a networked bulletin and a rolling news channel. I think "news" can be done differently, just watch Channel 4 News, More 4 News and then something like Sky News, there is a clear difference between all of them and to a certain degree I would agree that ITV need to find a niche (many the entertainment side of things, if I were asked) to work well.