MS
Very true, but that was exactly the reason why I chose those figures - when a major event was occuring, people decided to overwhelmingly turn to the BBC and Sky over ITV, and there must be a better reason than it being off freeview or further down the EPG.
Admittedly, it has improved since the ITN days, but some parts of that format do still exist. There are many times during the day where there are no lives or guests, especially when in the second studio, and they do still rely heavily on reports and whole half hours being repeated without being updated. With Sky or BBC, you can guarantee that there will be a large number of lives, and reports are updated throughout the day at a higher rate than at ITV.
Secondly, ITV is the nations largest commercial broadcaster, and it has 50yrs of news gathering behind it. How can it be said the name or brand 'ITV News Channel' is not recognisable when they have that history, albeit it was called ITN news until a couple of years ago, but people arent stupid and know what theyre getting - they'll realise 'ITV news Channel' is owned by the same people that broadcast news on ITV for 50yrs.
I dont see how EPG number can have that much of an impact either - if you know a channel is worth watching, then you would skip the crap and go straight to it. Plus, its not difficult for people to remember Sky is on 501 and ITV news is on 525, it takes the same amount of time to key in the number on the remote.
Quote:
But beware of those viewing figures. By definition more people turn to news channels when a big story breaks, so figures will be up.
Very true, but that was exactly the reason why I chose those figures - when a major event was occuring, people decided to overwhelmingly turn to the BBC and Sky over ITV, and there must be a better reason than it being off freeview or further down the EPG.
Quote:
The fact that it is much newer and that it is way down the EPG on Sky are also two big reasons
Saying that the content hasn't changed since the days of the ITN News Channel is ridiculous. Do you actually remember the ITN News Channel? A single presenter with no guests reading 30 minute news bulletins every half an hour, to compare that with what we have today is nonsense.
Saying that the content hasn't changed since the days of the ITN News Channel is ridiculous. Do you actually remember the ITN News Channel? A single presenter with no guests reading 30 minute news bulletins every half an hour, to compare that with what we have today is nonsense.
Admittedly, it has improved since the ITN days, but some parts of that format do still exist. There are many times during the day where there are no lives or guests, especially when in the second studio, and they do still rely heavily on reports and whole half hours being repeated without being updated. With Sky or BBC, you can guarantee that there will be a large number of lives, and reports are updated throughout the day at a higher rate than at ITV.
Secondly, ITV is the nations largest commercial broadcaster, and it has 50yrs of news gathering behind it. How can it be said the name or brand 'ITV News Channel' is not recognisable when they have that history, albeit it was called ITN news until a couple of years ago, but people arent stupid and know what theyre getting - they'll realise 'ITV news Channel' is owned by the same people that broadcast news on ITV for 50yrs.
I dont see how EPG number can have that much of an impact either - if you know a channel is worth watching, then you would skip the crap and go straight to it. Plus, its not difficult for people to remember Sky is on 501 and ITV news is on 525, it takes the same amount of time to key in the number on the remote.