CM
Yeah you are right sorry.
I was just looking through some pages, and now that the new look has settled in. I now think the 2004 look looked so much more professional with the graphics.
Images from TVnewsroom.co.uk:
http://tvnewsroom.co.uk/images/itvnews/2p/1003215216_27.jpg
http://tvnewsroom.co.uk/images/itvnews/2p/0208185445_121.jpg
The newswall worked so much better. Now it looks very messy, especially with that stupid clock face around the studio floor.
They could have made a really nice background with the new look graphics, a dark teal with lighter light beams slowly animating. Also there were no restrictions with the previous look, now a lot of camera angles dont work.
Have to dissagree with this. The new look is cleaner, crisper, brighter fresher and more welcoming. It creates an immense amount of depth which makes the studio look huge.
The overall graphics package has been cleaned up, simplified and is now more coherent than (IMO) any other news organisation.
I DO think that sometimes the don't use the wall to its best advantage and that sometimes the use of vt to illustrate the stories can lead to a messy look, but the example captures differ in that one is a graphic treatment and the other a vt split. When the use a graphic inset treatment it works much better than the old style.
Also think its kinda irrelevent whether the old look was any good or not. It's been redesigned - move on. If there are changes to be made, suggest looking to the future, not the past!
CentralWest posted:
James Hall posted:
Notice please that he defends ITV's earlier Sunday bulletin. Don't make false judgements.
Yeah you are right sorry.
I was just looking through some pages, and now that the new look has settled in. I now think the 2004 look looked so much more professional with the graphics.
Images from TVnewsroom.co.uk:
http://tvnewsroom.co.uk/images/itvnews/2p/1003215216_27.jpg
http://tvnewsroom.co.uk/images/itvnews/2p/0208185445_121.jpg
The newswall worked so much better. Now it looks very messy, especially with that stupid clock face around the studio floor.
They could have made a really nice background with the new look graphics, a dark teal with lighter light beams slowly animating. Also there were no restrictions with the previous look, now a lot of camera angles dont work.
Have to dissagree with this. The new look is cleaner, crisper, brighter fresher and more welcoming. It creates an immense amount of depth which makes the studio look huge.
The overall graphics package has been cleaned up, simplified and is now more coherent than (IMO) any other news organisation.
I DO think that sometimes the don't use the wall to its best advantage and that sometimes the use of vt to illustrate the stories can lead to a messy look, but the example captures differ in that one is a graphic treatment and the other a vt split. When the use a graphic inset treatment it works much better than the old style.
Also think its kinda irrelevent whether the old look was any good or not. It's been redesigned - move on. If there are changes to be made, suggest looking to the future, not the past!
