FA
It is pre-recorded. The jib camera operator is only at ITN for certain hours of the day. Therefore, they pre-record the moving camera shots while he/she is in work. The same thing happened on other occasions, too. It makes ITV News look very cheap.
Is it just me that thinks it would be better to use the overhead camera all of the time for top and tail of the bulletin - ala Morning news? That way it could stay live, couldn't it?
Thinking back, this is where the 2004 look was better as the end graphics end sequence that appeared on the wall still offered something to a stationary camera.
itsrobert posted:
pip posted:
did anybody capture the end of the Evening News yesterday... Bill and Mary started their catwalk, then different angle and they started it again. Surely it isn't pre-recorded, so how could this have happened?
'Home Secretary you're huge... please don't eat us'
'Home Secretary you're huge... please don't eat us'
It is pre-recorded. The jib camera operator is only at ITN for certain hours of the day. Therefore, they pre-record the moving camera shots while he/she is in work. The same thing happened on other occasions, too. It makes ITV News look very cheap.
Is it just me that thinks it would be better to use the overhead camera all of the time for top and tail of the bulletin - ala Morning news? That way it could stay live, couldn't it?
Thinking back, this is where the 2004 look was better as the end graphics end sequence that appeared on the wall still offered something to a stationary camera.
TE
Is it just me that thinks it would be better to use the overhead camera all of the time for top and tail of the bulletin - ala Morning news? That way it could stay live, couldn't it?
Thinking back, this is where the 2004 look was better as the end graphics end sequence that appeared on the wall still offered something to a stationary camera.
I think they record the live view too sometimes. I noticed this on the late bulletin a couple of months back. If you look here you'll see what I mean:
http://www.tvforum.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=18985&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=3456#506076
fanoftv posted:
Is it just me that thinks it would be better to use the overhead camera all of the time for top and tail of the bulletin - ala Morning news? That way it could stay live, couldn't it?
Thinking back, this is where the 2004 look was better as the end graphics end sequence that appeared on the wall still offered something to a stationary camera.
I think they record the live view too sometimes. I noticed this on the late bulletin a couple of months back. If you look here you'll see what I mean:
http://www.tvforum.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=18985&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=3456#506076
SA
[quote="fanoftv"]
Thinking back, this is where the 2004 look was better as the end graphics end sequence that appeared on the wall still offered something to a stationary camera.
WHAT IS THE WORLD COMING TO where a national news bulletin on a major channel PRE RECORDS the presenters walking across the set to edit into the closing titles as if it was happening there and then live??
WHY DO THAT?? spesh in the current climate of faking stuff in TV - to find out the TV news is faking stuff blatanty beggars belief!!
itsrobert posted:
pip posted:
did anybody capture the end of the Evening News yesterday... Bill and Mary started their catwalk, then different angle and they started it again. Surely it isn't pre-recorded, so how could this have happened?
It is pre-recorded. The jib camera operator is only at ITN for certain hours of the day. Therefore, they pre-record the moving camera shots while he/she is in work. The same thing happened on other occasions, too. It makes ITV News look very cheap.
It is pre-recorded. The jib camera operator is only at ITN for certain hours of the day. Therefore, they pre-record the moving camera shots while he/she is in work. The same thing happened on other occasions, too. It makes ITV News look very cheap.
Thinking back, this is where the 2004 look was better as the end graphics end sequence that appeared on the wall still offered something to a stationary camera.
WHAT IS THE WORLD COMING TO where a national news bulletin on a major channel PRE RECORDS the presenters walking across the set to edit into the closing titles as if it was happening there and then live??
WHY DO THAT?? spesh in the current climate of faking stuff in TV - to find out the TV news is faking stuff blatanty beggars belief!!
IT
itsrobert
Founding member
[quote="salfordjohn"]
Thinking back, this is where the 2004 look was better as the end graphics end sequence that appeared on the wall still offered something to a stationary camera.
WHAT IS THE WORLD COMING TO where a national news bulletin on a major channel PRE RECORDS the presenters walking across the set to edit into the closing titles as if it was happening there and then live??
WHY DO THAT?? spesh in the current climate of faking stuff in TV - to find out the TV news is faking stuff blatanty beggars belief!!
It's hardly as if it's anything new. As Londoner said, ITV News have been pre-recording their opening sequences for years, as have many of the local BBC news programmes. I remember on one occasion, the tape of the opening to North West Tonight actually re-wound on the air, leaving Gordon Burns looking rather embarrassed.
fanoftv posted:
itsrobert posted:
pip posted:
did anybody capture the end of the Evening News yesterday... Bill and Mary started their catwalk, then different angle and they started it again. Surely it isn't pre-recorded, so how could this have happened?
It is pre-recorded. The jib camera operator is only at ITN for certain hours of the day. Therefore, they pre-record the moving camera shots while he/she is in work. The same thing happened on other occasions, too. It makes ITV News look very cheap.
It is pre-recorded. The jib camera operator is only at ITN for certain hours of the day. Therefore, they pre-record the moving camera shots while he/she is in work. The same thing happened on other occasions, too. It makes ITV News look very cheap.
Thinking back, this is where the 2004 look was better as the end graphics end sequence that appeared on the wall still offered something to a stationary camera.
WHAT IS THE WORLD COMING TO where a national news bulletin on a major channel PRE RECORDS the presenters walking across the set to edit into the closing titles as if it was happening there and then live??
WHY DO THAT?? spesh in the current climate of faking stuff in TV - to find out the TV news is faking stuff blatanty beggars belief!!
It's hardly as if it's anything new. As Londoner said, ITV News have been pre-recording their opening sequences for years, as have many of the local BBC news programmes. I remember on one occasion, the tape of the opening to North West Tonight actually re-wound on the air, leaving Gordon Burns looking rather embarrassed.
BB
ITN, Gray's Inn Road, London
C4Fan posted:
Out of interest, does anybody know where ITV News is filmed?
ITN, Gray's Inn Road, London
KI
It is pre-recorded. The jib camera operator is only at ITN for certain hours of the day. Therefore, they pre-record the moving camera shots while he/she is in work. The same thing happened on other occasions, too. It makes ITV News look very cheap.
Sorry but that is really cheap and nasty!
Quote:
It is pre-recorded. The jib camera operator is only at ITN for certain hours of the day. Therefore, they pre-record the moving camera shots while he/she is in work. The same thing happened on other occasions, too. It makes ITV News look very cheap.
Sorry but that is really cheap and nasty!