BR
I'm probably waffling here rather than getting straight to the point, but I do like the way ITV News are using James Mates.
Using him as the regular stand-in on the 10.30pm works so much better than having a random fill in (or Nina Hossain) and in many ways the bulletins he presents, especially on a Friday, are his bulletins - not just him standing in for Mark.
I think his role as senior correspondent also gives him much more credibility too when he does step into the newsroom.
Using him as the regular stand-in on the 10.30pm works so much better than having a random fill in (or Nina Hossain) and in many ways the bulletins he presents, especially on a Friday, are his bulletins - not just him standing in for Mark.
I think his role as senior correspondent also gives him much more credibility too when he does step into the newsroom.
JO
I feel I can trust James more than Mark. Mark's presentation is far too ''read all about it'' tabloid cockney git. James adds much more credibility and expertise to the show on a Friday and he's finally starting to overcome the slipups he makes.
Brekkie Boy posted:
I'm probably waffling here rather than getting straight to the point, but I do like the way ITV News are using James Mates.
Using him as the regular stand-in on the 10.30pm works so much better than having a random fill in (or Nina Hossain) and in many ways the bulletins he presents, especially on a Friday, are his bulletins - not just him standing in for Mark.
I think his role as senior correspondent also gives him much more credibility too when he does step into the newsroom.
Using him as the regular stand-in on the 10.30pm works so much better than having a random fill in (or Nina Hossain) and in many ways the bulletins he presents, especially on a Friday, are his bulletins - not just him standing in for Mark.
I think his role as senior correspondent also gives him much more credibility too when he does step into the newsroom.
I feel I can trust James more than Mark. Mark's presentation is far too ''read all about it'' tabloid cockney git. James adds much more credibility and expertise to the show on a Friday and he's finally starting to overcome the slipups he makes.
JO
People here take things so literally, get real. I mean, his delivery is too alarmist/extreme at times and adds his own spin on things far too often. His accent, as I had said, okay, it isn't a conventional ''newsreader'' one, or ''received pronunciation'' for the literate amongst you, and I must admit to being shallow that that grates on my nerves. His accent makes him incredulous at times and I just can't take him seriously.
Luke posted:
Mark Austin is not a 'cockney' nor is he in anyway reminiscent of one. What an odd thing to say.
People here take things so literally, get real. I mean, his delivery is too alarmist/extreme at times and adds his own spin on things far too often. His accent, as I had said, okay, it isn't a conventional ''newsreader'' one, or ''received pronunciation'' for the literate amongst you, and I must admit to being shallow that that grates on my nerves. His accent makes him incredulous at times and I just can't take him seriously.