The Newsroom

ITV may now keep local news

(March 2010)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
:-(
A former member
Well, how will he get back all the service he gotten rid of?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/mar/16/itv-archie-norman-regional-news
Quote:
ITV's Archie Norman considers U-turn on dumping regional news

ITV's new chairman, Archie Norman, is understood to be rethinking the broadcaster's decision to dump regional news, potentially throwing a further obstacle into the path of the government's plan to contract this programming out to independent suppliers.

Norman has been conducting a strategic review of all ITV's activities since taking over from Michael Grade in January and is said to be considering reversing his predecessor's decision to withdraw from local news provision for the English regions and Wales.

"Archie thinks ITV should continue to do regional news," a source close to the ITV chairman said. "His sentiment is that it is important, not something to walk away from."

ITV's attitude is understood to be hardening against the plan to test independently financed news consortiums (IFNCs) in Wales, Scotland and the North East and Borders region, which would produce regional bulletins for ITV1. The scheme is being rushed through parliament ahead of a likely May general election.

ITV currently provides regional news programming for two of the three pilots, in Wales and the North-East and Border region, and staff in these areas will transfer to the consortiums. STV supplies news for Scotland.

Should ITV wish to make a U-turn on dumping regional news production, the decision is not currently in its hands. The Department for Culture, Media and Sport is overseeing a tender process involving eight bidders for the three pilot schemes, with a decision due to be announced by the culture secretary, Ben Bradshaw, next Thursday.

The Conservatives are opposed to the plan, however – the shadow culture spokesman, Jeremy Hunt, has promised to block the proposal's passage through parliament as part of the digital economy bill.

A source involved in the process said that ITV executives are concerned about keeping control of advertising airtime around the regional news slots on ITV1, the quality of the proposed replacement services, and the longer-term implications of losing control of parts of the schedule on its flagship network.

In the English regions, the main ITV1 regional bulletin goes out between 6pm and 6.30pm, with other shorter local updates in the morning and at the end of the 1.30pm and 10pm network news programmes.

Another concern within ITV is said to be that is that the consortiums cut across Norman's attempts to boost the broadcaster's standing with the City, potentially grooming it for a sale or takeover, which could be hampered by a series of messy, publicly funded regional news partnerships.

Even if it continues producing local news for the English regions and Wales, ITV may look to make further cuts to the budget for the service, now about £60m a year. In late 2008 ITV cut 429 regional news staff – about 40% of the total – and £40m from budget.

ITV insiders said they have been working with the department to ensure the bidding process is successful, answering about 200 questions. However, others involved in the process dispute this.

During the process of public consultation and drawing up draft contracts the bidders needed key details from ITV, such as how many of the existing regional news staff they would be expected to transfer to the consortiums, under legislation to protect workers' rights.

One bidder said that the final draft contracts from would be suppliers had to be submitted by a deadline of Monday 8 March, but claimed ITV dragged its feet in providing key details until the Friday and Saturday before the deadline.

ITV is also said to have also tried, unsuccessfully, to demand oversight of the bidders' proposals. This is understood to have been rejected in favour of more general discussions.

Insiders at ITV admitted some replies were not sent until 5 or 6 March, but said that most questions were answered well before then. ITV has employed specialist consultants and lawyers on the process.

The selection panel chaired by Richard Hooper is on schedule to make a decision on the three winners next Tuesday, 23 March, ahead of Bradshaw's announcement on 25 March.

Successful bidders will share a pot of licence fee money from the digital switchover surplus worth £40m and will also have to sign a contract with ITV, which remains responsible for compliance.

• To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000.

• If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly "for publication".
IS
Inspector Sands
Well, how will he get back all the service he gotten rid of?

As the article says they haven't been given away yet and the whole process was unlikely to happen if the Tories get into power in May.

Even though the announcement about who is doing them is next week it would be very easy just to scrap the scheme... well until the contracts are signed and the legal work is done regarding staff etc
JJ
jjne
It should now no longer be up to ITV, frankly.

If they want to keep it, it should be on Ofcom's terms.

Ofcom, and the powers that be have a golden opportunity to make demands here. Any organisation that produces this service should have clear rules laid out, and an obligation to stick to them for a set period of time regardless of whether it is profitable.

For example, if the consensus among the bidders for the North East/Borders service is that the broadcast should be 100% split, ITV should be mandated to reintroduce a 100% split in order to keep the licence.
TV
TV Geek
I'm not sure if they still plan to do it or not, but I really think the best idea is a regional news joint venture between the BBC and ITV. In the current TV landscape it seems to be the only way forward and the only way ITV will really be able to get away with cost cutting. Plus I don't think many people will watch, for example, Granada Reports then switch over to North West Tonight, so I don't think it will matter so much about repeated stories. But this should be at the cost of ITV not airing any adverts between 6pm and 6.30pm (something which doesn't happen here in the Granada region anyway).
IS
Inspector Sands
I'm not sure if they still plan to do it or not, but I really think the best idea is a regional news joint venture between the BBC and ITV. In the current TV landscape it seems to be the only way forward and the only way ITV will really be able to get away with cost cutting. Plus I don't think many people will watch, for example, Granada Reports then switch over to North West Tonight, so I don't think it will matter so much about repeated stories. But this should be at the cost of ITV not airing any adverts between 6pm and 6.30pm (something which doesn't happen here in the Granada region anyway).

That's not a great idea - it would mean no plurality as well as no competition. The latter is fairly important as it stops programmes from getting lazy - you'd end up with a fairly pedestrian programme being shown twice

There was the idea of ITV and BBC regional news sharing facilities and premises a few years ago but it didn't go anywhere. It would also cause many problems operationally
TV
TV Geek

That's not a great idea - it would mean no plurality as well as no competition. The latter is fairly important as it stops programmes from getting lazy - you'd end up with a fairly pedestrian programme being shown twice

There was the idea of ITV and BBC regional news sharing facilities and premises a few years ago but it didn't go anywhere. It would also cause many problems operationally


May be crossed wires due to my initial wording. The BBC and ITV produce 2 very different types of regional news- the BBC tend to focus more on news whilst ITV take a more magazine approach having a few main news stories but the majority of the show is focused on people, lifestyle and events. On air I do think the shows should have two separate identities and continue with their approaches, but off air I think they should share the fundamental facilities such as news gathering teams. They just provide the raw facts, its up to the reporters and producers how the facts are fabricated and presented.

As I say I think thats one of the only ways regional news can survive in its current form. With multichannels etc the ratings are very low and as a result it becomes a loss making venture, meaning the budget is inevitably slashed. And with a slashed budget comes reduced quality. And if a programme quality deteriorates, people stop watching. So its a bit of a vicious circle.
BR
Brekkie
Trouble is even if the two are editorially independent ultimately in the not too distant future a decision will be made the funding two regional programmes is not justified.
TJ
TedJrr
Trouble is even if the two are editorially independent ultimately in the not too distant future a decision will be made the funding two regional programmes is not justified.


That's right - the Government's proposal is not sustainable politically. The solution has to be a far wider, and frankly cleverer one than just using public-sector money to supplant something that a commercial concessionaire isn't going to do any-more.

ITV are right to be wary of the process, and right to want to retain control.

DCMS, who have largely marginalised OfCom on this, really have no competence in this area and are likely to make poor decisions as a result.
TJ
TedJrr
.... The BBC and ITV produce 2 very different types of regional news- the BBC tend to focus more on news whilst ITV take a more magazine approach having a few main news stories but the majority of the show is focused on people, lifestyle and events..


That's a very good point. They are different, this certainly shows if you compare London Tonight and BBC London News or the two offerings in the North West where ITV's quality has held up.

However, compare (say) Look East with Anglia News and you get a very vivid glimpse of the disparity of quality that has arisen between the two networks. Anglia's programme is light and people focused, but the lack of depth simply exposes it comparison with the BBC's journalistic clout. Even on straight matter-of-record news the BBC's reporting prises out more stories. This leaves Anglia with a sorry litany of easy stories, such as crime and public authorities complaining about funding.

ITV's original Michael Grade era proposal was to move into fewer regions, to assure the quality of magazine format lfestyle based shows running in the early evening. Well, this hasn't worked with Anglia, or as far as I can tell Meridian.
NG
noggin Founding member
They just provide the raw facts, its up to the reporters and producers how the facts are fabricated and presented.


In most ITV and BBC Newsrooms the newsgathering teams ARE the reporters and producers, with just a couple of forward planning support people. Sure you could share the forward planning team - but it wouldn't save much money...

The reporters are the people who find out the facts AND present them to the audience - that's what regional journalists do. The producers are those who build the running order, decide the story order and with the reporters agree story treatments etc.

Newer posts