MA
They covered the vote live at 00:30ish, but when all the interesting prorogation stuff was going on between 01:30-02:00 they were on Asia Buisness Report, Sport Today and the weather.
Which to be fair is 8am in the Far East, and exactly what the viewers in that region would have expected and appreciated
But which region should take precedence? Viewers in Asia or licence-fee paying viewers in the UK? It does seem to me that the BBC puts far more value on its international offerings than it does to its domestic commitments. They can't possible broadcast something UK-centric to the world, yet UK viewers have to put up with all sorts of pretty irrelevant foreign news thanks to the cutbacks.
All this serves to do is to make BBC News appear worthless to UK viewers and will result in further cutbacks. In times gone by I would automatically go to BBC News to follow developing stories; now it's Sky News all the way. Nine times out of ten it's something pretty irrelevant on BBC News.
They covered the vote live at 00:30ish, but when all the interesting prorogation stuff was going on between 01:30-02:00 they were on Asia Buisness Report, Sport Today and the weather.
Which to be fair is 8am in the Far East, and exactly what the viewers in that region would have expected and appreciated
But which region should take precedence? Viewers in Asia or licence-fee paying viewers in the UK? It does seem to me that the BBC puts far more value on its international offerings than it does to its domestic commitments. They can't possible broadcast something UK-centric to the world, yet UK viewers have to put up with all sorts of pretty irrelevant foreign news thanks to the cutbacks.
All this serves to do is to make BBC News appear worthless to UK viewers and will result in further cutbacks. In times gone by I would automatically go to BBC News to follow developing stories; now it's Sky News all the way. Nine times out of ten it's something pretty irrelevant on BBC News.
Well, they clearly can't afford to provide a 24/7 domestic news service, but bear in mind BBC World is a commercial enterprise paid for by subscriptions (one way or another)
To be honest, when I'm abroad and something big is happening here, I watch Sky News, which is available widely abroad as well.
The BBC need to come clean and state they are struggling to run a domestic news channel, transparency will earn them more kudos than the poorly resourced output they are limping along with.
However all that said, what was lacking from BBC Parliament's coverage?
They covered the vote live at 00:30ish, but when all the interesting prorogation stuff was going on between 01:30-02:00 they were on Asia Buisness Report, Sport Today and the weather.
Which to be fair is 8am in the Far East, and exactly what the viewers in that region would have expected and appreciated
But which region should take precedence? Viewers in Asia or licence-fee paying viewers in the UK? It does seem to me that the BBC puts far more value on its international offerings than it does to its domestic commitments. They can't possible broadcast something UK-centric to the world, yet UK viewers have to put up with all sorts of pretty irrelevant foreign news thanks to the cutbacks.
All this serves to do is to make BBC News appear worthless to UK viewers and will result in further cutbacks. In times gone by I would automatically go to BBC News to follow developing stories; now it's Sky News all the way. Nine times out of ten it's something pretty irrelevant on BBC News.
They covered the vote live at 00:30ish, but when all the interesting prorogation stuff was going on between 01:30-02:00 they were on Asia Buisness Report, Sport Today and the weather.
Which to be fair is 8am in the Far East, and exactly what the viewers in that region would have expected and appreciated
But which region should take precedence? Viewers in Asia or licence-fee paying viewers in the UK? It does seem to me that the BBC puts far more value on its international offerings than it does to its domestic commitments. They can't possible broadcast something UK-centric to the world, yet UK viewers have to put up with all sorts of pretty irrelevant foreign news thanks to the cutbacks.
All this serves to do is to make BBC News appear worthless to UK viewers and will result in further cutbacks. In times gone by I would automatically go to BBC News to follow developing stories; now it's Sky News all the way. Nine times out of ten it's something pretty irrelevant on BBC News.
Well, they clearly can't afford to provide a 24/7 domestic news service, but bear in mind BBC World is a commercial enterprise paid for by subscriptions (one way or another)
To be honest, when I'm abroad and something big is happening here, I watch Sky News, which is available widely abroad as well.
The BBC need to come clean and state they are struggling to run a domestic news channel, transparency will earn them more kudos than the poorly resourced output they are limping along with.
However all that said, what was lacking from BBC Parliament's coverage?