CA
But....
If Best hadn't been an alcoholic who abused a donated liver, do you think the coverage would have been remotely similar to that seen this week?
Really?
There wouldn't have been quite as much coverage, of course, but your still doing the man's celebrity status - drink disregarded - down.
And what's your point? I don't quite see the argument that ''well, if he hadn't been a drinker he wouldn't be so famous, so let's not cover it''. He was a drinker... he was famous for it to an extent... so they covered it.
What do you want them to do, turn around and say ''We're not going to devote much time to this man, because he suffered from alcoholism''?
You seem to be moaning not about broadcasters covering the story, but that they're covering it because he was an alcoholic rather than a great footballer. The fact of the matter is that the man was internationally famous (it even made top story on the CNN.com US edition website, not just the international version, to give you an idea) and so I think they're justified in what they did.
The BBC hate covering ''celebrities'' because they think it's below them. They get in a flap about it. They spend so much time fannying about thinking about whether they should do it that they negate to think about how they should do it, and it's normally a big mess.
Dunedin posted:
But....
If Best hadn't been an alcoholic who abused a donated liver, do you think the coverage would have been remotely similar to that seen this week?
Really?
There wouldn't have been quite as much coverage, of course, but your still doing the man's celebrity status - drink disregarded - down.
And what's your point? I don't quite see the argument that ''well, if he hadn't been a drinker he wouldn't be so famous, so let's not cover it''. He was a drinker... he was famous for it to an extent... so they covered it.
What do you want them to do, turn around and say ''We're not going to devote much time to this man, because he suffered from alcoholism''?
You seem to be moaning not about broadcasters covering the story, but that they're covering it because he was an alcoholic rather than a great footballer. The fact of the matter is that the man was internationally famous (it even made top story on the CNN.com US edition website, not just the international version, to give you an idea) and so I think they're justified in what they did.
The BBC hate covering ''celebrities'' because they think it's below them. They get in a flap about it. They spend so much time fannying about thinking about whether they should do it that they negate to think about how they should do it, and it's normally a big mess.