BN
Ok, so David Manion has stated in an interview with The Observer that appointment -to-view news is here to stay, but 24 hour news has a limited shelf life. I just wanted to gather opinions of the forum of his statement, particularly the comment over rolling news.
Whist Sky News was seen as the future of news in 1989 - it was seen as news on demand - is it still the future? I personally, don't see rolling news as the future, but as the present, the hear and now. Rather than replacing ATV news, it has merely complimented it.
It's no longer news on demand - due to the fact that 'red-button', podcasts and internet news, which IMO is more 'on demand'.
What about ATV news - I think that its very much here to stay - but I also favour the 60 second/ five news update shows, which seems to bring news on demand to a wider audience.
Radio news and tv news have worked side by side for years, will interactive news fit in with them and replace rolling news?
Over to you - what is the future of television news?
Whist Sky News was seen as the future of news in 1989 - it was seen as news on demand - is it still the future? I personally, don't see rolling news as the future, but as the present, the hear and now. Rather than replacing ATV news, it has merely complimented it.
It's no longer news on demand - due to the fact that 'red-button', podcasts and internet news, which IMO is more 'on demand'.
What about ATV news - I think that its very much here to stay - but I also favour the 60 second/ five news update shows, which seems to bring news on demand to a wider audience.
Radio news and tv news have worked side by side for years, will interactive news fit in with them and replace rolling news?
Over to you - what is the future of television news?