Another problem with Natasha is that more often than not it looks like the lights are on, but no one's at homes. Seeing Sian on Friday shows the difference between the 2 - Sian engages with the guests, but also manages to be serious enough when doing the news part of the show, although admitedly Sian, when with Bill can go a bit OTT at times.
I had a disturbing dream about her the other night. I was watching the end of the news, and Sophie decided to get out of her chair and do a dance to the music on that raised bit of floor where the desk is.
Unfortunately, she fell over and her skirt came off revealing everything (Ms Raworth wasn't wearing any underwear you see). I was shocked.
Fiona is a good presenter infact she's nearly as good as the lovely Natasha Kaplinsky - Newscaster Of The Year . I wouldn't want Natasha to read the main news bulletins tho as I enjoy watching her on breakfast - 3 hrs everyday of my absolute favourite personality of all time!!!
What if its one of those dreams that come true! It might be worth watching the 6pm just in case.
Equidem posted:
I had a disturbing dream about her the other night. I was watching the end of the news, and Sophie decided to get out of her chair and do a dance to the music on that raised bit of floor where the desk is.
Unfortunately, she fell over and her skirt came off revealing everything (Ms Raworth wasn't wearing any underwear you see). I was shocked.
I agree Fiona Bruce is a fine presenter and IMO is worthy of the newscaster of the year 2003 title. She has had years of exprience in broadcasting, she has a vast knowledge and is versatile. She's can go from reporting in Kurdistan and the mid-east ( to name but a few) to presenting current affairs programmes and crimewatch.
She manages to do so much without getting in my face.
Natasha on the other hand ,does need to decide where she wants her career to go. I find it hard to take her seriously as a news presenter she seems much better suited to presenting entertainment programmes.