The Newsroom

Election Night Results 2019: Presentation and Coverage

(December 2019)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
DO
dosxuk
JAS84 posted:
RDJ posted:
So opinions on overall coverage now that the sun is rising and all the votes are in.

I think Sky surprised us all. Impressive graphics, great studio set up, the sweeping camera shots across Sky Centre were gorgeous. A big thumbs up.

ITV not too bad. Same studio as ever. Wa the coverage I stuck to the most. I like the atrium area but it seemed poorly set up and not utilised completely to its potential. It's also a shame they have to hand over to GMB at 6am - once I heard Piers shouting I had to turn off.

BBC was quite a big disappointment. A very underwhelming studio for them which was too restricted by its small size. The CGI overhead graphics were awful. Reeta was not a good appointment to the touch screen element. And why on earth would they continue with the hexagon map in the NBH foyer in the freezing cold and pouring rain. The BBC didn't really manage to cope with both the last minute calling of the election as well as the December date and it showed.
That hexagon map isn't even geographically accurate. They have one of Hull's three seats (which are all Labour) separated from the other two, by Cleethorpes (a Conservative constituency), of all places - that should be further south than Hull, not above two thirds of it! I get that they made all constituencies the same size, but places within the same town should still be adjacent to each other and everywhere should be placed geographically relative to each other. I bet there's other places with this problem.


The entire point of that map is that it's not geographically accurate!

Having laid out similar maps in the past, it's not always possible to have the correct layout of different areas in relation to their real world counterparts. Any area which borders more than 6 other areas, common in urban areas, will be separated from art least one of its neighbours.

I much preferred that map when it was being done in the Vine VR bits. It was easy to highlight areas and show the relation between the real and hexagon map. I don't know what the outdoor map actually beings to the coverage, other than getting to show off the plaza in front of NBH. I'd rather have seen Vine do his stuff in AR (a la Scottish referendum) out there (with some rain cover!) and scrap the physical map.
BF
BFGArmy
Respectfully disagree Moz and Schwing. I find if the numbers keep going up with no real mention of the seats in studio I end up wondering what I’m missing.
Plus I find some live declaratioms break up the coverage too so it’s not just studio guests chatting away for hours on end which gets dull after a while.

What I liked with Sky was that both the content and presentation was very good. Of course on these sort of occasions BBC will get the lion’s share of viewing figures but Sky should be commended on a job well done
Last edited by BFGArmy on 13 December 2019 12:35pm
TR
trivialmatters
The BBC studio was really very gloomy and the CGI was pretty poor looking. The BBC News studios and newsroom as a whole look really dated and drab. Even the lighting of the Media Cafe for the big screen was very 90s, all coloured lighting and gradients.

Wish they could brighten the place up and give it a lick of paint. Neutralise some of the red in the newsroom and make the space more versatile.

The Scotland atrium was miles ahead.
GO
gottago
Think the Sky News 45k figure is for the entire night's coverage from start to finish. Here are more accurate figures:

Election 2019: 10pm-11pm

2019 vs 2017

BBC1: 6.1m (37.8%) vs 6.2m (33.5%)
ITV: 2.3m (14.3%) vs 1.7m (9.3%)
Sky News: 512,000 (3.2%) vs 485,000 (2.6%)
BBC News: 506,000 (3.1%) vs 548,000 (3%)
Channel 4: 466,000 (2.9%) vs 802,000 (4.4%)

Election 2019: 10pm-2am

BBC1: 4.3m (42.4%)
ITV: 1.4m (13.6%)
Sky News: 393,000 (4%)
BBC News: 389,000 (3.4%)
Channel 4: 240,000 (2.4%)
GE
thegeek Founding member
Sky News’s G-UKTV providing the aerial shots above Buckingham Palace.

Arena Aviation's G-UKTV. It just happens that Sky have a contract to use it Smile

RTE News set up:



[...]
They probably have their setup located at their London office at Grays Inn Road where both ITV & Channel 4 are having their coverage.

The view (and window layout) looks like Westminster Live, across the Thames from Parliament.
CU
Custard56
It's funny how some posted along the lines of David Dimbleby being past his best during the last election in 2017, but now we have posts along the lines of the BBC's coverage not being "special" enough because Dimbleby wasn't anchoring. I realise from different posters but it just seems like whatever the BBC do on election night, it will never be good enough.

Personally, I felt that Huw did an admirable job anchoring and Andrew Neil is always good value.
VM
VMPhil
Dimbleby may have been past his best but I still tuned in to the BBC because it was Dimbleby. I just don't really rate Huw Edwards as an election presenter, though. None of that would have mattered if I didn't have to change channels so I could actually see the counts.

Also we know on TVF that everyone will tune into the BBC, as pres nerds of course we're going to switch between all the different channels, because we're pres nerds.
chevron, London Lite and Jon gave kudos
JO
Jon
It seems as through no matter how much we say the BBC's coverage was rubbish, the ratings seems to say otherwise.





Surprised Channel 4 managed 240k. I watched a bit and it wasn't funny and it wasn't particularly informative either so switched back between mainly BBC and ITV.[/quote]
I disagree, I’m surprised it got beaten by ITV and Sky to be honest. The presenters where a bit ‘meh’ compared to previous line ups, but the discussions where really fun to watch, especially with Stanley Johnson there. To be honest once I watched exit polls on the BBC, I stayed with Channel 4 apart from checking out some of the bits with Andrew Neil and seeing how Bercow was getting on Sky.
MS
msim
Huw Edwards was fine presenting and Dimbleby was right to be pensioned off. To me it felt the BBC didn't know what exactly it was doing and just threw together a confused mess. I said it last night but there has been for about four elections now with a ridiculous duplication of resources with -last night - Vine, Chakrabati and Rayworth having virtually pointless bit part roles but all doing basically the same thing. Probably each of them had about 15-20 mins of contribution over the course of the entire night. Vine I just cannot stand regardless of what he is doing. He presents a wall of words masked by 'flashy' gimmick graphics that might have impressed in the 90s but now just are incredibly naff. Chakrabati umming and erring away whilst bashing at that screen which like Vine didn't add anything to explain much in context. They were both used far too infrequently so that if there was any result worth pointing out it actually was brought up ages later if at all, and worse they even took off the the results ticker whilst his bit is on so once normal coverage resumed there was a slew of results just thrown at the screen in bulk. And the less said about the total waste of effort of dumping a giant wooden map out in the pitch dark in the wet and cold of a winter's night the better. All three of those role could have been combined in to one and it would have still meant enough variety in the presentation overall. Why was John Curtis wheeled out only about three times?

The biggest gripe though was how the BBC decided to utterly give up on actually providing a RESULTS service. Yes discussion/commentary is needed but for well over an hour there wasn't a single result brought live from a count. Flashing up dozens and dozens of results on a ticker that disappears after five seconds doesn't replicate seeing the result declared live or seeing some big names survive or fall. No lives/delayed replays of Raab's or IDS's counts which were widely tipped to be close, nothing of Grieve, Soubry or any other of the former Tories standing, nothing of Nigel Dodds going, virtually not a single declaration from any cabinet or shadow cabinet member for heavens sake. All of these were just afterthought mentions that made the coverage flat.

The BBC has had a truly dreadful election this year. An obsession with leader debates that undermined the detailed set-piece interviews, no specific programmes for the incumbent/challenger for any great office of state and the increasing breakdown in the competency of their political editor.
JA
Jarv
Unfortunately I agree, I also noticed there was no live counts for over an hour, makes you feel like you missed out on something, recorded SKY's coverage, might be nerdy and watch that some point
TV
TVLand
Don’t know if this has been mentioned already, but GMB used a new bed after the titles this morning. I quite like it.
WH
Whataday Founding member
What is it with the BBC's obsession to hit the top of the hour? Jack Straw was giving an insightful interview only to be cut off so they could run the TOTH.

Newer posts