GO
You can get the gist from this part of the article:
It’s the fourth times in three years that they’ve been in breach so it’s not unreasonable for C4 to threaten them with changing supplier.
Quote:
Speaking to the culture, media and sport select committee on Tuesday, C4 chair Charles Gurassa said the mistake was “one incident too many”.
He revealed that the broadcaster had informed ITN the breach was “completely unacceptable” and of “such magnitude” that it had been referred to the C4 board.
The board responded by launching an independent review into the mistake and tightening internal procedures to ensure “lessons had been learned”.
Despite this, Gurassa and outgoing chief executive David Abraham said C4 would seek an alternative news provider if such a mistake occurred again.
“If we saw this happening again that would be the nature of the conversation,” Abraham said. “I can’t defend the breaches – they have occurred.”
He revealed that the broadcaster had informed ITN the breach was “completely unacceptable” and of “such magnitude” that it had been referred to the C4 board.
The board responded by launching an independent review into the mistake and tightening internal procedures to ensure “lessons had been learned”.
Despite this, Gurassa and outgoing chief executive David Abraham said C4 would seek an alternative news provider if such a mistake occurred again.
“If we saw this happening again that would be the nature of the conversation,” Abraham said. “I can’t defend the breaches – they have occurred.”
It’s the fourth times in three years that they’ve been in breach so it’s not unreasonable for C4 to threaten them with changing supplier.
