MW
It's actually to do with maximising profits, the CCTV manufacturers would rather licence people to use players etc than have a common standard.
The issue is in practical terms, it can cost prosecutions and allow offenders to get away with crime. They could, if they wanted to output to a nice H.264 MP4 file, some systems do - others use strange archives which must be extracted. The way you get around tampering with files is to export them from the system to a disc (which will store all sorts of information including an audit trial) with a master copy to use as evidence and a working copy to view, show in interview etc.
I've had to bail people pending CCTV, then rebail them later because the technology simply wouldn't work on our systems. Wholly unnacceptable,
The issue is in practical terms, it can cost prosecutions and allow offenders to get away with crime. They could, if they wanted to output to a nice H.264 MP4 file, some systems do - others use strange archives which must be extracted. The way you get around tampering with files is to export them from the system to a disc (which will store all sorts of information including an audit trial) with a master copy to use as evidence and a working copy to view, show in interview etc.
I've had to bail people pending CCTV, then rebail them later because the technology simply wouldn't work on our systems. Wholly unnacceptable,