The Newsroom

CCTV footage on the news

(July 2017)

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
MW
Mike W
It's actually to do with maximising profits, the CCTV manufacturers would rather licence people to use players etc than have a common standard.

The issue is in practical terms, it can cost prosecutions and allow offenders to get away with crime. They could, if they wanted to output to a nice H.264 MP4 file, some systems do - others use strange archives which must be extracted. The way you get around tampering with files is to export them from the system to a disc (which will store all sorts of information including an audit trial) with a master copy to use as evidence and a working copy to view, show in interview etc.
I've had to bail people pending CCTV, then rebail them later because the technology simply wouldn't work on our systems. Wholly unnacceptable,
NG
noggin Founding member
Sounds like cleanest way to get video out would to have a external video capture device to record to a hard drive.


Yep - though some use VGA or similar outputs which are a pain to capture in the field.

Quote:

But I gotta ask why are there some many proprietary file codecs? Is it to prevent tampering with the video.


Codecs aren't always that proprietary - but the wrappers often are.

Quote:

Edit : Don't some systems have SDI outputs? If they do they could just play it out through the pool video input so many cameras have.


Many have SDI inputs (it's a nice connection standard that goes decent distances on coax) - fewer have SDI outputs, as SDI displays are higher-end.
VM
VMPhil
Wow, I didn’t realise CCTV software was such a PITA. Thanks for all your posts. I guess I was too optimistic in thinking there’d be a standard for that kind of system. In the meantime, my friendly advice is to at least close the curtains when recording another screen Laughing

Newer posts