DO
You mean it's actually laid out simply and with thought into who works there, what they need to do and where they need to go, as opposed to how neatly it fits on a grid on Wikipedia?
I don't understand the thinking behind putting the radio 1 & 3 studios together, simply because they're radio studios, when actually putting them in the parts of the building those people are working makes much more sense. Likewise, why shouldn't the world service have their studios near their office space, rather than in the basement with the network studios? Just doesn't make sense.
The structure is fairly simple and flexible - above the TV studios, apps rooms and plant in the lower floors it's all open plan.
The radio studios are spread throughout the building because the departments that use them are too. Makes no sense to have the studios for Radio 3 and the studios for Radio 1 in the same place when they're built for very different programming and the production teams work in different parts of the building.
The radio studios are spread throughout the building because the departments that use them are too. Makes no sense to have the studios for Radio 3 and the studios for Radio 1 in the same place when they're built for very different programming and the production teams work in different parts of the building.
You mean it's actually laid out simply and with thought into who works there, what they need to do and where they need to go, as opposed to how neatly it fits on a grid on Wikipedia?
I don't understand the thinking behind putting the radio 1 & 3 studios together, simply because they're radio studios, when actually putting them in the parts of the building those people are working makes much more sense. Likewise, why shouldn't the world service have their studios near their office space, rather than in the basement with the network studios? Just doesn't make sense.