IT
Agreed, its much too short, bit by bit the BBC is ruining BBC World.
An interesting definition of ruining, when the ad take is up 46% this year and the audience is up to 76 million each week!
But, quantity is not always a measure of quality. The content of BBC World has never dipped below excellent in all the years I have been watching. Editorially, it is top class. That's why you get 76 million viewers a week. However, presentationally the channel is being ruined. Here's a few pointers:
1) No thought goes into the quality of idents, titles and stings. Compare the current set to the 2000-2003 ones. The level of detail in those titles was incredibly, right down to tiny place names rotating on the cream background and radio waves pulsating all over the place. What do we have now? A strange red thing on a plain black background.
2) Stings being removed altogether or butchered beyond recognition. Why did the business/sport stings go? They were handy tools to signify sections of the bulletins. Where's the closing music gone? Yes, I know that bulletin closes were supposedly reducing viewer numbers, but why then, do they still use them for TWT, WNT and programmes like WBR, Sport Today and Asia Today? Surely people switch off after those, too? How about the weather ident? A once imaginative set of titles (2000-2005) has been reduced to nothing more than a slide with a horrendous edit of the music.
3) Dodgy logos. Admittedly, things are generally OK now, but what about the horrendous logos on the last titles that were not corrected for over 2 years? That screams no attention to detail.
4) A cheap and tacky set. Whoever came up with bright white and red plexiglass needs to be shot. The previous set/newsroom was far less distracting and had a more formal feel. Even better than that was the flags era set. If you look at the current set for too long, it begins to hurt your eyes because it is so bright!
There's four points to mull over, and there are probably more. As I said earlier, this is not about BBC World's content. That's excellent, and always has been. The problem is, the channel looks a mess.
itsrobert
Founding member
archiveTV posted:
harshy posted:
eanok posted:
Have to say BBC World really does bad on the weather - it's too short and I dont think the forecast is useful to me. CNN's and AJE's are definitely better.
Agreed, its much too short, bit by bit the BBC is ruining BBC World.
An interesting definition of ruining, when the ad take is up 46% this year and the audience is up to 76 million each week!
But, quantity is not always a measure of quality. The content of BBC World has never dipped below excellent in all the years I have been watching. Editorially, it is top class. That's why you get 76 million viewers a week. However, presentationally the channel is being ruined. Here's a few pointers:
1) No thought goes into the quality of idents, titles and stings. Compare the current set to the 2000-2003 ones. The level of detail in those titles was incredibly, right down to tiny place names rotating on the cream background and radio waves pulsating all over the place. What do we have now? A strange red thing on a plain black background.
2) Stings being removed altogether or butchered beyond recognition. Why did the business/sport stings go? They were handy tools to signify sections of the bulletins. Where's the closing music gone? Yes, I know that bulletin closes were supposedly reducing viewer numbers, but why then, do they still use them for TWT, WNT and programmes like WBR, Sport Today and Asia Today? Surely people switch off after those, too? How about the weather ident? A once imaginative set of titles (2000-2005) has been reduced to nothing more than a slide with a horrendous edit of the music.
3) Dodgy logos. Admittedly, things are generally OK now, but what about the horrendous logos on the last titles that were not corrected for over 2 years? That screams no attention to detail.
4) A cheap and tacky set. Whoever came up with bright white and red plexiglass needs to be shot. The previous set/newsroom was far less distracting and had a more formal feel. Even better than that was the flags era set. If you look at the current set for too long, it begins to hurt your eyes because it is so bright!
There's four points to mull over, and there are probably more. As I said earlier, this is not about BBC World's content. That's excellent, and always has been. The problem is, the channel looks a mess.