BA
Occasionally there are in-studio interviews done in London, so that is one reason why it's not in a cupboard.
Thanks for all the replies! It does explain it.
I agree entirely. I liked the former standard split screen as the presenters were actually looking at you - now the slight angles of the screens make it a bit awkward looking.
In actual fact, if the only real utilisation of the studio is that 2 second high shot at the start then why bother having the studio in use at all? I know the London presenter is actually in the same studio at the time of transmission, but surely you could instead stick them in front of a CSO in a cupboard somewhere if the bulk of the programme is made up a of electronically created shot of the screens rather than a live shot from that camera in front of them?
If it's a composite shot, then I don't know why they don't just go for a standard split-screen. I've always thought it looks a bit silly having them on the screens looking ever so slightly warped, and it feels even sillier now I know it isn't even real!
I agree entirely. I liked the former standard split screen as the presenters were actually looking at you - now the slight angles of the screens make it a bit awkward looking.
In actual fact, if the only real utilisation of the studio is that 2 second high shot at the start then why bother having the studio in use at all? I know the London presenter is actually in the same studio at the time of transmission, but surely you could instead stick them in front of a CSO in a cupboard somewhere if the bulk of the programme is made up a of electronically created shot of the screens rather than a live shot from that camera in front of them?
Occasionally there are in-studio interviews done in London, so that is one reason why it's not in a cupboard.