IT
The counterpoint is why broadcast both Radio 4 and World Service Radio in the UK?
Firstly because it's not funded by advertising, therefore it CAN be broadcast to the UK. The whole debate about BBC World being broadcast to the UK is futile because it cannot do so.
Secondly, my own opinion is that comparing R4 with the WS is not entirely fair. I listen to both frequently and they are quite different. I think of R4 as the BBC One of radio - if you imagine BBC One's programmes are much more high brow. Like BBC One, R4 has scheduled bulletins of news at various points of the day, but it isn't a rolling news channel. It has non-news programmes in between. By contrast, the WS is much more focused on news, business and current affairs and is similar in format to BBC World television. For this reason I don't think R4 and the WS are competing in the same way in which BBC News and BBC World would be.
Believe me - I've had access to both channels for 10 years - although they were quite different channels a decade ago, they really aren't dissimilar in 2012. In 2002, BBC World had less of a focus on news and much more on lifestyle programming: it used to show Top Gear and Holiday amongst others. I really don't think there's much difference between BBC World and BBC News any more. Both could now be considered rolling news channels with the only difference being editorial priorities.
itsrobert
Founding member
The counterpoint is why broadcast both Radio 4 and World Service Radio in the UK?
Firstly because it's not funded by advertising, therefore it CAN be broadcast to the UK. The whole debate about BBC World being broadcast to the UK is futile because it cannot do so.
Secondly, my own opinion is that comparing R4 with the WS is not entirely fair. I listen to both frequently and they are quite different. I think of R4 as the BBC One of radio - if you imagine BBC One's programmes are much more high brow. Like BBC One, R4 has scheduled bulletins of news at various points of the day, but it isn't a rolling news channel. It has non-news programmes in between. By contrast, the WS is much more focused on news, business and current affairs and is similar in format to BBC World television. For this reason I don't think R4 and the WS are competing in the same way in which BBC News and BBC World would be.
Believe me - I've had access to both channels for 10 years - although they were quite different channels a decade ago, they really aren't dissimilar in 2012. In 2002, BBC World had less of a focus on news and much more on lifestyle programming: it used to show Top Gear and Holiday amongst others. I really don't think there's much difference between BBC World and BBC News any more. Both could now be considered rolling news channels with the only difference being editorial priorities.