GE
thegeek
Founding member
Had me fooled - I was pretty convinced it was a real view, by the clarity of the view, and the angled glass in the windows (to prevent the studio lights reflecting straight at the cameras)
At least they've sorted the problem from the previous studio, where they only had 'daytime' or 'night-time' views - and occasionaly used them at the wrong time of day.
At least they've sorted the problem from the previous studio, where they only had 'daytime' or 'night-time' views - and occasionaly used them at the wrong time of day.
MA
What makes you think it's sorted?
Marcus
Founding member
thegeek posted:
Had me fooled - I was pretty convinced it was a real view, by the clarity of the view, and the angled glass in the windows (to prevent the studio lights reflecting straight at the cameras)
At least they've sorted the problem from the previous studio, where they only had 'daytime' or 'night-time' views - and occasionaly used them at the wrong time of day.
At least they've sorted the problem from the previous studio, where they only had 'daytime' or 'night-time' views - and occasionaly used them at the wrong time of day.
What makes you think it's sorted?
BA
Well, I don't think that they only had 'daytime' and night-time' views in the old Washington studio.
As I remember, one evening I was watching a bulletin from Washington and it was bright sunshine outside the studio, whereas here it was completely dark. Then I quickly reassured myself that it's jutst because of time-lag. Or I am wrong?
Marcus, what would you like to suggest with your previous post?
As I remember, one evening I was watching a bulletin from Washington and it was bright sunshine outside the studio, whereas here it was completely dark. Then I quickly reassured myself that it's jutst because of time-lag. Or I am wrong?
Marcus, what would you like to suggest with your previous post?