JA
Well, he just finished and he did a very good job. I wonder where Huw is because according to the Radio Times, he was suppose to be presenting tonight.
*sigh* Of course George did a good job, its what hes paid handsomely for!!
*You folks are so easy to wind up
. Anyway, where was I*,
Yep, I just said George did a good job, so what was your point?
Ffs, my point winifred, is that George has presented the 10 o'clock news numerous times in the past. He has presented many hundreds of news broadcasts over the years hes worked at the BBC, so you'd think that on any day, like today, he'd be able to present just as competently! It doesnt warrant a reply here, no-one cares, its not significant! In the space of a couple of mins, how could you make such a judgement. You made the post at 10.03, taking into account the time to actually search and make your post, you must have seen george on screen for less than 2mins, over half of which would have been reading the headlines - how can you judge 'a good job' in that tiny time frame when he did nothing particularly taxing!!
Now, now no need to swear . Like I said before I'm a good judge of competency. I don't need a long time to determine someones capabilities. 
Just like it didn't take us long to judge you as the arse you're being now. When you work for the TV Times, give us a call.
winifred posted:
msim posted:
winifred posted:
msim posted:
winifred posted:
winifred posted:
George is presenting the Ten tonight, he seems to be doing a good job so far.
Well, he just finished and he did a very good job. I wonder where Huw is because according to the Radio Times, he was suppose to be presenting tonight.
*sigh* Of course George did a good job, its what hes paid handsomely for!!
*You folks are so easy to wind up
. Anyway, where was I*,
Yep, I just said George did a good job, so what was your point?
Ffs, my point winifred, is that George has presented the 10 o'clock news numerous times in the past. He has presented many hundreds of news broadcasts over the years hes worked at the BBC, so you'd think that on any day, like today, he'd be able to present just as competently! It doesnt warrant a reply here, no-one cares, its not significant! In the space of a couple of mins, how could you make such a judgement. You made the post at 10.03, taking into account the time to actually search and make your post, you must have seen george on screen for less than 2mins, over half of which would have been reading the headlines - how can you judge 'a good job' in that tiny time frame when he did nothing particularly taxing!!
Now, now no need to swear
. Like I said before I'm a good judge of competency. I don't need a long time to determine someones capabilities.
Just like it didn't take us long to judge you as the arse you're being now. When you work for the TV Times, give us a call.