The Newsroom

New BBC social media guidelines

Bans on 'virtue signalling', criticism of colleagues & breaking stories on own accounts

This site closed in March 2021 and is now a read-only archive
UL
UsuallyLurks
Quote:
The BBC’s new social media guidelines include a ban on “virtue signalling” and posting any criticism of colleagues.

Staff have also been warned emojis can “undercut an otherwise impartial post” and that liking or following certain accounts can be enough to count as sharing a personal opinion on an issue.

Staff in news and current affairs and other factual journalism, along with all senior leaders across the corporation, will be held to higher impartiality standards regarding their personal posts than other employees.

This means they should treat their personal accounts as if they are actually BBC output complying with its strict editorial standards and should not post anything they couldn’t say on-air on a BBC programme or on its website.

Tim Davie (pictured), who took over as director-general last month, told staff the four overriding expectations are that they must not criticise other BBC staff in public, treat others “with respect and courtesy at all times”, not bring the corporation into “disrepute”, and never express personal opinions on matters of public policy, politics or “controversial subjects”.

In an email, he said: “Trust is the foundation of the BBC’s relationship with the public. How employees of the BBC conduct themselves is vital to maintaining trust.

“The materials published today will help ensure employees uphold and protect the highest standards of BBC impartiality and maintain the trust audiences expect, demand and deserve.”

Staff were told to avoid so-called virtue signalling which the BBC defined as “retweets, likes or joining online campaigns to indicate a personal view, no matter how apparently worthy the cause”.

The BBC’s editorial standards nevertheless allow staff to wear poppies on-screen if they choose between from Saturday 31 October to Wednesday 11 November.

They must avoid being seen to support any campaigns at all, such as by using hashtags, regardless of “how much their message appears to be accepted or uncontroversial”.

And staff should be wary of “revealed bias”, whether through likes or reposting other people’s posts so that a bias becomes evident, and “inferred bias”, where loose wording in an otherwise impartial post can allow readers to infer bias where there is none.

“Following social media accounts which reflect only one point of view on matters of public policy, politics or ‘controversial subjects’ may create a similar impression,” the new guidelines state.

BBC journalists and senior leaders were also warned against:

Linking to anything they haven’t read in full
Using emojis to “undercut an otherwise impartial post” whether accidentally or deliberately
Breaking news on a personal account – “If you have a story to break, the BBC platforms are your priority, even if it takes slightly longer”
Being “seduced” by the informality of social media – “Your posts about news events and issues require careful thought and editorial discipline”
Being drawn into “drawn into ill-tempered exchanges, or exchanges that will reflect badly on you, or the BBC”.
Disclaimers in a Twitter bio, for example, that say “my views, not the BBC’s” will not offer any defence and should not be used, the guidelines state.

News and current affairs staff have been banned from taking part in protests, marches or demonstrations about controversial issues but other BBC employees are allowed to do so as per the updated impartiality guidelines.

The BBC is also introducing stricter rules around external engagements for news presenters and senior staff, which will mean a “standardised approval process to ensure consistency and a central register of requests in each department”.

From the start of 2021, the BBC will publish a quarterly summary of these engagements for all senior leaders, presenters and on air staff working in journalism roles.


https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/bbc-social-media-guidelines-ban-virtue-signalling-criticism-of-colleagues-and-breaking-stories-on-your-own-accounts/

https://www.bbc.co.uk/editorialguidelines/guidance/individual-use-of-social-media

I know these guidelines specifically refer to social media activity, but surely poppy-wearing is a form of "virtue-signalling" and one that, by being allowed on TV, reaches a wider audience than I imagine most BBC employee social media accounts do?
Last edited by UsuallyLurks on 29 October 2020 3:58pm
BR
Brekkie
Clearly written by someone who doesn't understand either social media or freedom of speech.
MW
Mike W
Clearly written by someone who doesn't understand either social media or freedom of speech.

In fairness freedom of speech is a qualified right and it can be controlled by a public authority (such as the BBC) for certain reasons, including the protection of others reputations.
AndrewPSSP, davidhorman and LondonViewer gave kudos
OM
Omnipresent
A lot of it seems perfectly sensible. As I've said before, Laura Kuenssberg could have easily avoided many Twitter storms through more careful drafting of tweets.

Not getting engaged in ill-tempered exchanges is also sound advice. At Sky, I often wonder why Adam Boulton and Kay Burley bother replying or tweeting sometimes testy rebukes at trolls, rather than just ignoring them.

This is probably the most important part of the guidelines:

Quote:
m) Do not mistake social media networks as accurate reflections of public opinion; your audience is overwhelmingly elsewhere.
UN
Universal_r
I guess we know what huw Edwards thinks of them.


BR
Brekkie
This is falling apart very quickly and proving to be the latest example of the BBC being it's own biggest enemy. In 2020 our national broadcaster has banned employees from attending Pride events.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/oct/29/bbc-no-bias-rules-prevent-staff-joining-lgbt-pride-protests

Seem to be a case of pandering to a bigots view of impartiality rather than encouraging their staff to stand up for the values and virtues that civilised 21st century society should protect and embrace.
CM
cmthwtv
This is falling apart very quickly and proving to be the latest example of the BBC being it's own biggest enemy. In 2020 our national broadcaster has banned employees from attending Pride events.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/oct/29/bbc-no-bias-rules-prevent-staff-joining-lgbt-pride-protests

Seem to be a case of pandering to a bigots view of impartiality rather than encouraging their staff to stand up for the values and virtues that civilised 21st century society should protect and embrace.


Head of Newsgathering is saying that this is simply not the case...



Ghost, bilky asko and UTVLifer gave kudos
UT
UTVLifer
This is falling apart very quickly and proving to be the latest example of the BBC being it's own biggest enemy. In 2020 our national broadcaster has banned employees from attending Pride events.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/oct/29/bbc-no-bias-rules-prevent-staff-joining-lgbt-pride-protests

Seem to be a case of pandering to a bigots view of impartiality rather than encouraging their staff to stand up for the values and virtues that civilised 21st century society should protect and embrace.

This is exactly another case of the BBC vs the BBC.

Really BBC, not letting staff attend Pride events. What next?
JC
JCB
I know these guidelines specifically refer to social media activity, but surely poppy-wearing is a form of "virtue-signalling" and one that, by being allowed on TV, reaches a wider audience than I imagine most BBC employee social media accounts do?


But poppy wearing is a form of "virtue signalling" the flag shaggers these ridiculous guidelines are pandering to approve of so of course it gets a pass.
BR
Brekkie
If signing off a racist and homophobic company policy isn't a resignation issue then I'm not sure what is.
UN
Universal_r
They never seem to get it just right do they. Earlier in the year they went completely left wing and wanted to ban ‘rule Britannia’ and now they’ve gone the complete opposite way.
AS
AlexS
If signing off a racist and homophobic company policy isn't a resignation issue then I'm not sure what is.

I don't see how it's racist to tell people not to go to political demonstrations or to campaign for any cause on air or on social media. The particular issue that makes it homophobic is inaccurately classifying pride as a protest event and therefore including it in the ban.

Newer posts