NG
If you look at where SW has closed, it is in more developed parts of the world (such as Europe and North America) where several other platforms carrying the service in higher quality are available instead. This had resulted in the SW platform listener figures becoming very small in comparison. SW continues to broadcast to Africa and Central and Southern Asia.
Yep - though the real issue with FM is that of control. SW can be broadcast to a region from outside the region - whereas FM usually has to be broadcast from within the region the broadcasts are aimed at. Whilst this is fine in some areas - it can cause real issues in others. Say the government - or a commercial company - decides that it doesn't want its people to hear the BBC any more - they can terminate FM licenses or contracts and silence the BBC by removing them from FM. The same is not true of SW. At this point you are left with internet streaming - which can also be blocked... I think Russia is a case in point isn't it? The WS was pulled from lots of FM stations ISTR.
Sure FM is better quality - and in developed world regions (Europe etc.) where AM and SW are not that popular because they sound awful - FM (and DAB/DRM) is the way to go. However you always need to be aware that FM is not secure to the extent that SW is.
Similar arguments could be made about locating large chunks of your production staff overseas - though just as with FM there is a counter-argument that broadcasting to a country from presenters/producers within the same country will make the content more immediate and relevant and potentially less remote and parochial.
noggin
Founding member
Bvsh Hovse posted:
noggin posted:
That said - it is important not to think that EVERYONE is ditching radio - I know that there is significant concern that FM partnerships and web streaming are not filling the gaps left by cessation of SW radio services.
If you look at where SW has closed, it is in more developed parts of the world (such as Europe and North America) where several other platforms carrying the service in higher quality are available instead. This had resulted in the SW platform listener figures becoming very small in comparison. SW continues to broadcast to Africa and Central and Southern Asia.
Yep - though the real issue with FM is that of control. SW can be broadcast to a region from outside the region - whereas FM usually has to be broadcast from within the region the broadcasts are aimed at. Whilst this is fine in some areas - it can cause real issues in others. Say the government - or a commercial company - decides that it doesn't want its people to hear the BBC any more - they can terminate FM licenses or contracts and silence the BBC by removing them from FM. The same is not true of SW. At this point you are left with internet streaming - which can also be blocked... I think Russia is a case in point isn't it? The WS was pulled from lots of FM stations ISTR.
Sure FM is better quality - and in developed world regions (Europe etc.) where AM and SW are not that popular because they sound awful - FM (and DAB/DRM) is the way to go. However you always need to be aware that FM is not secure to the extent that SW is.
Similar arguments could be made about locating large chunks of your production staff overseas - though just as with FM there is a counter-argument that broadcasting to a country from presenters/producers within the same country will make the content more immediate and relevant and potentially less remote and parochial.