IS
What are you on about? What's Hansard got to do with anything?
I'm not sure where the £4 million figure has come from, according to the latest BBC accounts the cost just for the BBC Parliament channel is £10.3
Content £2.4 million
Distribution £6.5 million
Infrastructure/support £1.4 million.
( http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/annualreport/pdf/bbc_ar_online_2009_10.pdf )
Even so it's very cheap for a TV channel. By contrast, BBC Alba cost £6 million that year and only broadcasts for a few hours a day. It's also a third of what the BBC currently pays towards S4C
Again, you're confusing the coverage of parliament with the TV channel. BBC, ITV, C4, C5 and Sky own and fund PARBUL. BBC Parliament is a channel that uses the PARBUL pictures, which would exist anyway
Let "Hansard" do it and sell it on.
What are you on about? What's Hansard got to do with anything?
Quote:
£4m is £4m no matter which way you try and hide it.
£4m which could be used elsewhere.
£4m which could be used elsewhere.
I'm not sure where the £4 million figure has come from, according to the latest BBC accounts the cost just for the BBC Parliament channel is £10.3
Content £2.4 million
Distribution £6.5 million
Infrastructure/support £1.4 million.
( http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/annualreport/pdf/bbc_ar_online_2009_10.pdf )
Even so it's very cheap for a TV channel. By contrast, BBC Alba cost £6 million that year and only broadcasts for a few hours a day. It's also a third of what the BBC currently pays towards S4C
Quote:
IF the £4m is the BBC contribution to the costs and assuming that SKY News and ITV and others pay equal shares, then it gets very expensive!
Again, you're confusing the coverage of parliament with the TV channel. BBC, ITV, C4, C5 and Sky own and fund PARBUL. BBC Parliament is a channel that uses the PARBUL pictures, which would exist anyway