ST
Just had a look at the new titles: fantastic. They look much better animated than the stills we'd been seeing previews of. Looking forward to seeing the new look on television now, albeit on the "BBC News Channel" 
Bozz
Bozz
JA
That'd cost more. They're not contracted to do those hours.
True I suppose, but they're only hanging around the newsroom for half an hour anyway - it surely can't cost that much to pay them to do 30 minutes on a domestic channel.
Moz posted:
the eye posted:
Why don't they just get the BBC World presenter to do BBC World news from 9.30 - 10?
That'd cost more. They're not contracted to do those hours.
True I suppose, but they're only hanging around the newsroom for half an hour anyway - it surely can't cost that much to pay them to do 30 minutes on a domestic channel.
NE
That'd cost more. They're not contracted to do those hours.
True I suppose, but they're only hanging around the newsroom for half an hour anyway - it surely can't cost that much to pay them to do 30 minutes on a domestic channel.
It's partly asking more of them in terms of knowledge - World presenters have their heads tuned to what World are running, so switching into to 24 mode for half an hour and being across their stories is a big ask.
dragonhhjh posted:
Moz posted:
the eye posted:
Why don't they just get the BBC World presenter to do BBC World news from 9.30 - 10?
That'd cost more. They're not contracted to do those hours.
True I suppose, but they're only hanging around the newsroom for half an hour anyway - it surely can't cost that much to pay them to do 30 minutes on a domestic channel.
It's partly asking more of them in terms of knowledge - World presenters have their heads tuned to what World are running, so switching into to 24 mode for half an hour and being across their stories is a big ask.
WO
That'd cost more. They're not contracted to do those hours.
True I suppose, but they're only hanging around the newsroom for half an hour anyway - it surely can't cost that much to pay them to do 30 minutes on a domestic channel.
It's partly asking more of them in terms of knowledge - World presenters have their heads tuned to what World are running, so switching into to 24 mode for half an hour and being across their stories is a big ask.
Jonathan Charles manages OK when he's covered on News 24.
newsmonkey posted:
dragonhhjh posted:
Moz posted:
the eye posted:
Why don't they just get the BBC World presenter to do BBC World news from 9.30 - 10?
That'd cost more. They're not contracted to do those hours.
True I suppose, but they're only hanging around the newsroom for half an hour anyway - it surely can't cost that much to pay them to do 30 minutes on a domestic channel.
It's partly asking more of them in terms of knowledge - World presenters have their heads tuned to what World are running, so switching into to 24 mode for half an hour and being across their stories is a big ask.
Jonathan Charles manages OK when he's covered on News 24.
JA
That'd cost more. They're not contracted to do those hours.
True I suppose, but they're only hanging around the newsroom for half an hour anyway - it surely can't cost that much to pay them to do 30 minutes on a domestic channel.
It's partly asking more of them in terms of knowledge - World presenters have their heads tuned to what World are running, so switching into to 24 mode for half an hour and being across their stories is a big ask.
That's not what we're saying, though. Both the eye and myself are suggesting running a half hour a world news as used to be the case every day (then latterly every Sunday morning) at 9.30am.
newsmonkey posted:
dragonhhjh posted:
Moz posted:
the eye posted:
Why don't they just get the BBC World presenter to do BBC World news from 9.30 - 10?
That'd cost more. They're not contracted to do those hours.
True I suppose, but they're only hanging around the newsroom for half an hour anyway - it surely can't cost that much to pay them to do 30 minutes on a domestic channel.
It's partly asking more of them in terms of knowledge - World presenters have their heads tuned to what World are running, so switching into to 24 mode for half an hour and being across their stories is a big ask.
That's not what we're saying, though. Both the eye and myself are suggesting running a half hour a world news as used to be the case every day (then latterly every Sunday morning) at 9.30am.
KI
That'd cost more. They're not contracted to do those hours.
True I suppose, but they're only hanging around the newsroom for half an hour anyway - it surely can't cost that much to pay them to do 30 minutes on a domestic channel.
It's partly asking more of them in terms of knowledge - World presenters have their heads tuned to what World are running, so switching into to 24 mode for half an hour and being across their stories is a big ask.
Jonathan Charles manages OK when he's covered on News 24.
Yeah for a day not half an hour...
Interesting that the Ten is still going to have rehearsal time- a good move in my book!
Worzel posted:
newsmonkey posted:
dragonhhjh posted:
Moz posted:
the eye posted:
Why don't they just get the BBC World presenter to do BBC World news from 9.30 - 10?
That'd cost more. They're not contracted to do those hours.
True I suppose, but they're only hanging around the newsroom for half an hour anyway - it surely can't cost that much to pay them to do 30 minutes on a domestic channel.
It's partly asking more of them in terms of knowledge - World presenters have their heads tuned to what World are running, so switching into to 24 mode for half an hour and being across their stories is a big ask.
Jonathan Charles manages OK when he's covered on News 24.
Yeah for a day not half an hour...
Interesting that the Ten is still going to have rehearsal time- a good move in my book!
WO
That'd cost more. They're not contracted to do those hours.
True I suppose, but they're only hanging around the newsroom for half an hour anyway - it surely can't cost that much to pay them to do 30 minutes on a domestic channel.
It's partly asking more of them in terms of knowledge - World presenters have their heads tuned to what World are running, so switching into to 24 mode for half an hour and being across their stories is a big ask.
Jonathan Charles manages OK when he's covered on News 24.
Yeah for a day not half an hour...
Interesting that the Ten is still going to have rehearsal time- a good move in my book!
I have to say though it's been nice seeing Gavin Estler covering some shifts on News 24. Don't see much of him on there anymore - why's that?
kitt22 posted:
Worzel posted:
newsmonkey posted:
dragonhhjh posted:
Moz posted:
the eye posted:
Why don't they just get the BBC World presenter to do BBC World news from 9.30 - 10?
That'd cost more. They're not contracted to do those hours.
True I suppose, but they're only hanging around the newsroom for half an hour anyway - it surely can't cost that much to pay them to do 30 minutes on a domestic channel.
It's partly asking more of them in terms of knowledge - World presenters have their heads tuned to what World are running, so switching into to 24 mode for half an hour and being across their stories is a big ask.
Jonathan Charles manages OK when he's covered on News 24.
Yeah for a day not half an hour...
Interesting that the Ten is still going to have rehearsal time- a good move in my book!
I have to say though it's been nice seeing Gavin Estler covering some shifts on News 24. Don't see much of him on there anymore - why's that?