HO
You do realise that BBC News employs journalists (correspondents and reporters) that don't appear on TV or on the radio?
E.g.
Wilshaw warns staffroom 'moaners'; Sean Coughlan; BBC News education correspondent
'Confusion' over summer-born school starting age; Katherine Sellgren; BBC News education reporter
Internet gap hits poorer children, campaigners claim; Patrick Howse; BBC News, education reporter
On the other hand, I can't be the only one suspecting an existing onair correspondent will be promoted to Editor status and their previous position, in effect, disappear. I'm sure I'm being hyper cynical here, but with recent media comments about the number of male editors to female editor(s) at the broadcaster, it seems interesting that they're adding editors to two briefs usually (though not exclusively) covered by women (Reeta Chackrabati, Jane Hughes, Jane Draper etc.). It would certainly be interesting to see if by the end of the year the BBC have three female Editors, all in newly-created positions, and ten male editors.
They also seem to be slightly odd briefs to add. I would have thought defense would make more sense than education, for example? The job of an editor isn't usually just to report on a particular issue, but actively break stories through a wide range of contacts. Unless this is the BBC's attempt to 'own' healthcare and education stories by appointing broadcasters with better connections, I'm not sure I see the point. And usually those types of stories are handled by political correspondents (or editor) anyway. Caroline Wyatt, by contrast, must have a fairly strong hold of the defense industry by now?
I take issue with this. Its a pet hate of mine actually. Is 'correspondent' a dirty word these days? In my view there should be a Political Editor, Business Editor, Foreign Affairs Editor and Home Editor and the rest should be titled correspondents. Its the same at Sky, they have a City Editor and Economics Editor yet no City or Economics Correspondents. In my view the role of editor should be one with gravitas and not just thrown about especially if there are no correspondents working under the editor per se. How can you justify having an Education Editor when education stories are on the news no more than a couple of times a week? In fact other than the usual GCSE and A Level results days how often do we see Reeta Chakrabarti on the national news. A pointless exercise in my view. Carrie Gracie has also been appointed China Editor recently. I think when you have so many 'Editor's' the significance of the title is diminished. Anyway RANT OVER!
You do realise that BBC News employs journalists (correspondents and reporters) that don't appear on TV or on the radio?
E.g.
Wilshaw warns staffroom 'moaners'; Sean Coughlan; BBC News education correspondent
'Confusion' over summer-born school starting age; Katherine Sellgren; BBC News education reporter
Internet gap hits poorer children, campaigners claim; Patrick Howse; BBC News, education reporter
On the other hand, I can't be the only one suspecting an existing onair correspondent will be promoted to Editor status and their previous position, in effect, disappear. I'm sure I'm being hyper cynical here, but with recent media comments about the number of male editors to female editor(s) at the broadcaster, it seems interesting that they're adding editors to two briefs usually (though not exclusively) covered by women (Reeta Chackrabati, Jane Hughes, Jane Draper etc.). It would certainly be interesting to see if by the end of the year the BBC have three female Editors, all in newly-created positions, and ten male editors.
They also seem to be slightly odd briefs to add. I would have thought defense would make more sense than education, for example? The job of an editor isn't usually just to report on a particular issue, but actively break stories through a wide range of contacts. Unless this is the BBC's attempt to 'own' healthcare and education stories by appointing broadcasters with better connections, I'm not sure I see the point. And usually those types of stories are handled by political correspondents (or editor) anyway. Caroline Wyatt, by contrast, must have a fairly strong hold of the defense industry by now?